Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Atrial fibrillation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Outcome prediction from an observational registry
Vincenzo Nuzzi1, Antonio Cannatà1, Paolo Manca1
1Cardiovascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), University of Trieste, Via P. Valdoni 7, 34100 Trieste, Italy.
Insights
Permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients, though uncommon, significantly worsens prognosis. This study highlights permanent AF as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in DCM, emphasizing its clinical importance.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a complex heart condition with significant morbidity and mortality.
- The specific impact of different atrial fibrillation (AF) subtypes on DCM progression and outcomes remains incompletely understood.
- Investigating the role of AF in DCM is crucial for improving patient management and long-term prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the epidemiological and prognostic significance of various atrial fibrillation (AF) types in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
- To assess the long-term impact of permanent AF (permAF) versus paroxysmal/persistent AF on hard clinical outcomes in DCM.
- To identify permAF as a potential independent predictor of adverse events in a DCM cohort.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of consecutive DCM patients from the Trieste Muscle Heart Disease Registry.
- Utilized uni- and multivariable analyses, extended Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and propensity score-matching.
- Composite outcome included all-cause death, heart transplantation, or ventricular-assist device implantation.
Main Results:
- Out of 1181 DCM patients, 3.9% had baseline permanent AF (permAF) and 5.6% had a history of paroxysmal/persistent AF.
- Permanent AF patients were older, had higher NYHA class, and larger left atrial diameter compared to sinus rhythm (SR) patients.
- Multivariable analysis identified permAF as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (HR 2.45; p < 0.001); paroxysmal/persistent AF showed neutral prognostic value.
Conclusions:
- Permanent AF has a low prevalence and incidence in DCM but carries significant prognostic implications.
- Permanent AF is a strong, independent predictor of hard clinical outcomes in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
- These findings underscore the importance of monitoring and managing AF in DCM patients to mitigate risks.
Background:
Little is known about the role of different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We investigated the epidemiological and prognostic impact of different types of AF in DCM during long-term follow-up.
Method:
We evaluated consecutive DCM patients enrolled in the Trieste Muscle Heart Disease Registry. Uni- and multivariable, extended Kaplan-Meier and propensity score-matching analyses were performed for a composite outcome including death/heart transplantation/ventricular-assist device implantation.
Results:
Out of 1181 DCM patients (71% males, age 49 ± 15 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 33 ± 11%), 46 (3.9%) had baseline permanent AF (permAF), while 66 (5.6%) had a history of paroxysmal/persistent AF. Compared with sinus rhythm (SR) patients, permAF patients were older (48 ± 15 vs. 61 ± 11 respectively, p = 0.001), were more frequently in NYHA class III-IV (18% vs. 30%, p = 0.002) and had larger left atrium diameter (40 ± 8 vs. 50 ± 10 mm, respectively). Paroxysmal/persistent AF patients had intermediate characteristics between permAF and SR. During a median follow-up of 135 (75-210) months, 63 patients developed permAF (0.45 new cases/100patients/year). At multivariable analysis, permAF as a time-dependent variable was an independent outcome predictor (HR 2.45; 95% C.I. 2.61-3.63, p < 0.001), together with creatinine, NYHA class, restrictive filling pattern and moderate-severe mitral regurgitation, while paroxysmal/persistent AF was neutral. Propensity score-matching analysis confirmed the higher rate of primary outcome events in patients with baseline or incident permAF versus patients without permAF during a very long-term follow-up (70% vs. 20%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
PermAF in a large DCM cohort had low prevalence and incidence but had a relevant. prognostic role on hard outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy

