Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
[A retrospective analysis of single preterm birth incidence and high-risk factors based on maternal age
Objective: To compare the preterm birth rate among different age groups and analyze relative high-risk factors of preterm birth. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of single pregnant women ≥28 gestational weeks from January 2013 to May 2019 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical Hospital. All involved women were divided into three groups according to age, Group 1 (aged<35 years), Group 2 (aged 35-39 years), and Group 3 (aged ≥40 years). The preterm birth rate among 3 groups was compared and their high-risk factors were analyzed. Results: There were 48 288 singleton pregnancies during the study period, of which 3 351 were preterm births, preterm birth rate was 6.94% (3 351/48 288). In Group 1, there were 42 020 women, of which 2 699 were preterm births (6.42%, 2 699/42 020); in Group 2, there were 5 061 women, of which 491 were preterm births (9.70%, 491/5 061); and in Group 3, there were 1 207 women, of which 161 were preterm births (13.34%, 161/1 207). Comparing the spontaneous preterm birth rates among the three groups, Group 1 was the lowest one and Group 3 was the highest one (3.72% vs 4.51% vs 5.88%); comparing the medical preterm birth rates among the three groups, Group 1 also was the lowest one and Group 3 also was the highest one (2.70% vs 5.20% vs 7.46%); the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of spontaneous and medical preterm birth according gestational weeks were compared among three groups and there were no significant differences (P>0.05). Comparing and analyzing the high-risk factors of medical preterm birth, the incidence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and fetal distress in Group 1 were higher than those in Group 2 and 3; the incidence of placenta praevia were significantly higher in Group 2 and 3 than that in Group 1; the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: Maternal age is a significant high-risk factor of both spontaneous preterm birth and medical preterm birth, and the risk of preterm birth increases with age. For medical preterm birth, compared with right-age pregnant women, placenta praevia is the high-risk factor for women in advanced maternal age(AMA), which have great effect on medical preterm birth rate of AMA.
Objective: To compare the preterm birth rate among different age groups and analyze relative high-risk factors of preterm birth. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of single pregnant women ≥28 gestational weeks from January 2013 to May 2019 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical Hospital. All involved women were divided into three groups according to age, Group 1 (aged<35 years), Group 2 (aged 35-39 years), and Group 3 (aged ≥40 years). The preterm birth rate among 3 groups was compared and their high-risk factors were analyzed. Results: There were 48 288 singleton pregnancies during the study period, of which 3 351 were preterm births, preterm birth rate was 6.94% (3 351/48 288). In Group 1, there were 42 020 women, of which 2 699 were preterm births (6.42%, 2 699/42 020); in Group 2, there were 5 061 women, of which 491 were preterm births (9.70%, 491/5 061); and in Group 3, there were 1 207 women, of which 161 were preterm births (13.34%, 161/1 207). Comparing the spontaneous preterm birth rates among the three groups, Group 1 was the lowest one and Group 3 was the highest one (3.72% vs 4.51% vs 5.88%); comparing the medical preterm birth rates among the three groups, Group 1 also was the lowest one and Group 3 also was the highest one (2.70% vs 5.20% vs 7.46%); the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of spontaneous and medical preterm birth according gestational weeks were compared among three groups and there were no significant differences (P>0.05). Comparing and analyzing the high-risk factors of medical preterm birth, the incidence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and fetal distress in Group 1 were higher than those in Group 2 and 3; the incidence of placenta praevia were significantly higher in Group 2 and 3 than that in Group 1; the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: Maternal age is a significant high-risk factor of both spontaneous preterm birth and medical preterm birth, and the risk of preterm birth increases with age. For medical preterm birth, compared with right-age pregnant women, placenta praevia is the high-risk factor for women in advanced maternal age(AMA), which have great effect on medical preterm birth rate of AMA.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Meiosis vs. Mitosis
Before the start of mitosis and meiosis I, the cell synthesizes DNA, resulting in two homologous copies of each chromosome. DNA synthesis is...
Oogenesis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

