Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility
Published on: August 8, 2014
Metropolitan Reclassification and the Urbanization of Rural America
Kenneth M Johnson1, Daniel T Lichter2
1Department of Sociology and Carsey School of Public Policy, University of New Hampshire, 345B McConnell Hall, 15 Academic Way, Durham, NH, 03824, USA. ken.johnson@unh.edu.
County reclassification significantly boosted metropolitan populations, masking rural decline. This shift redefined over 70 million people, impacting rural poverty and economic growth narratives.
Area of Science:
- Demography
- Urban Studies
- Rural Sociology
Background:
- Decadal reclassification of U.S. counties from nonmetropolitan to metropolitan status has occurred between 1960 and 2017.
- This reclassification impacts nearly 25% of nonmetropolitan counties and 70 million residents.
- The narrative of widespread rural decline may be influenced by these definitional changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the paradoxical implications of county reclassification on U.S. population distribution.
- To examine the role of reclassification versus endogenous growth in metropolitan population shifts.
- To understand the effects of reclassification on rural socioeconomic indicators.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing U.S. Census Bureau data from 1960 to 2017.
- Analyzing county-level reclassification by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
- Comparing population shifts attributed to reclassification versus internal growth within metropolitan areas.
Main Results:
- Reclassification of 753 nonmetropolitan counties to metropolitan status shifted nearly 70 million people.
- All metropolitan population share growth since 1970 resulted from reclassification, not internal growth.
- Reclassification impacts inferences on rural poverty, aging, education, and economic growth.
Conclusions:
- The study reveals a paradox where population and economic growth in reclassified counties leave behind others with limited prospects.
- Cautionary lessons are provided regarding the common narrative of rural decline.
- Highlights the interdependent demographic fates of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties.
More Related Videos
09:44Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
Published on: October 16, 2018
12:27Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
Published on: February 15, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Selected Data About Geographic Locations
Thematic Layering in GIS
Primary Distribution
Introduction to GIS
Regional Terms
Primarily, the human body has two major regions, the axial and appendicular regions. The axial region comprises regions from the head to the abdomen and makes up the central body axis. In contrast,...
Methods of Obtaining Topography