Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

A Treatment Package without Escape Extinction to Address Food Selectivity
Published on: August 21, 2015
Acceptability and Feasibility of Best Practice School Lunches by Elementary School-Aged Children in a Serve Setting:
Jillian M Joyce1, Kyleen Harris2, Emily L Mailey3
1Department of Nutritional Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Background:
National School Lunch Program (NSLP) standards have improved school lunch dietary quality (DQ), however, further improvements could be made. Acceptability and feasibility of higher DQ are potential barriers. Thus, the purpose is to compare acceptability and feasibility of best practice (BPSL, optimizing DQ) with typical school lunches (TSL, meeting minimum NSLP standards) served separately and concurrently.
Methods:
Forty elementary school-aged participants were recruited for a randomized crossover trial. Participants attended three meal conditions (MC) choosing one of two meal types-MC1) BPSL1/BPSL2, MC2) TSL1/TSL2, MC3) BPSL/TSL. Acceptability included taste test surveys, weighted plate waste assessments, and hunger scales. Feasibility included meal cost, time, and skill and equipment requirements.
Results:
There were no significant differences in total taste test score, average total plate waste, or change in hunger (ps > 0.017) before or after adjusting for covariates. TSL was selected significantly more often in MC3 (TSL = 83.3%, BPSL = 16.7%, p = 0.001). Meal cost (p = 0.783) and skill and equipment requirements were not significantly different between meal types. BPSL required significantly longer preparation time (TSL = 60 ± 25 min, BPSL = 267 ± 101 min, p = 0.026).
Conclusions:
Results indicate few differences in acceptability and feasibility between BPSL and TSL. This study could inform decision and policy-makers seeking to improve school lunch DQ and acceptance of higher DQ meals.
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

