Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025
Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
Published on: March 12, 2021
Analysis of three-dimensional facet joint displacement during two passive upper cervical mobilizations
Davide Siccardi1, Luca Buzzatti2, Michele Marini1
1Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Italy; Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, department KIMA, Experimental Anatomy Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Building L, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Elsene, Belgium.
Background:
Understanding the 3D-kinematics of the upper cervical spine during manual mobilization is essential for clinical examination and therapy. Some information about rotational motion is available in literature but translational components are often ignored, complicating the understanding of the complex inter-segmental motions.
Objectives:
This study aims to describe the amount, trajectories and reproducibility of atlanto-occipital facet joints' displacement during a flexion-extension mobilization and of the atlanto-axial facet joints during an axial rotation mobilization.
Design:
Original research using quantitative data.
Methods:
20 fresh frozen human cervical specimens were examined with a Zebris® CMS20 ultrasound-based motion tracking system. Two physiotherapists performed regionalmobilizations in flexion-extension and axial rotation. The amount of displacement and the trajectories were calculated along the XYZ axes. Difference between measurements was evaluated with the Friedman two-way ANOVA test. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were estimated through ICC scores.
Results:
3D-displacement (2.6-23.4 mm) was larger at C1-C2 during axial rotation, Atlanto-occipital flexion displayed the greatest variability in the C0 trajectory. During a right rotation, the left C1 facet moved mainly forward, and the right C1 facet moved backward. During a left rotation, the left C1 facet moved backward, while the right C1 facet moved forward. Intra-tester and Inter-tester ICCs varied between 0.5 and 0.90 (p < 0.005).
Conclusions:
During passive spinal motion, there is an important variability in magnitude and trajectory of joints' displacement. Nevertheless, different clinicians may be able to achieve the same position at the end of the mobilization.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Three-Dimensional Analysis of Strain
01:16Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry
01:28Articulations of the Vertebral Column
01:09Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
01:25Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
01:24Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...