Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025
Mouse Model of Surgical Uterine Injury and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
Published on: June 27, 2025
Improving reproductive outcomes of intrauterine insemination: Does endometrial scratch injury help? A randomised
Navdeep Kaur Ghuman1, Sunil Raikar1, Pratibha Singh1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, 342005, India.
Objective(S):
Current evidence suggests that endometrial injury improves clinical pregnancy rate while having no effect on miscarriages in women undergoing IVF/ICSI. However, there is no substantial evidence to advocate the use of endometrial injury to benefit the outcomes of IUI treatment. Additionally, there is no clear consensus about the ideal timing, underlying mechanism and optimum intensity of endometrial injury required. The study examines the effect of intentional endometrial injury/scratch in the early proliferative phase of stimulated cycle on reproductive outcomes (clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates and miscarriage occurrence) of intra-uterine insemination treatment (IUI).
Study Design, Size, Duration:
This prospective, randomized control interventional study was conducted in a tertiary level teaching institution from April 2018 to February 2020. 150 eligible couples requiring IUI treatment who agreed to participate were randomly allocated on 1:1 basis to either control or intervention group. The trial participants received up to 3 cycles ovulation induction with clomiphene citrate and intra-uterine insemination. In addition, women in intervention group were subjected to endometrial scratch injury on day 6-7 of their stimulated cycle. 154 cycles in control arm and 128 cycles in intervention group were analyzed for clinical pregnancy, miscarriages and pain experienced by the women during endometrial scratch injury using the statistical package SPSS (version 21).
Result:
Similar cumulative clinical pregnancy rates (12.5% Vs 13.6%, RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.44-3.37, p = 0.713), biochemical pregnancy rates (17.1% vs 22.9%, RR 1.43, CI 0.59-3.47, p = 0.421) and ongoing pregnancy rates (10.93% Vs 11.47%, RR 1.05, CI 0.35-3.21, p = 924) were observed in control and intervention arms. Likewise, the relative risk of miscarriage occurrence in the intervention arm was 1.32 (95% CI 0.39-4.32, p = 1.000) which was not statistically different from control group. Mean pain score of 6.93 on numerical pain rating scale was experienced by women whilst having endometrial scratch injury.
Conclusions:
There is insufficient evidence to defend the use of endometrial scratch injury in intra-uterine insemination treatment, as it is moderately painful and have uncertain beneficial influence on reproductive outcomes.
