Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensory Modalities01:15

Sensory Modalities

3.5K
Sensation typically is the process by which the sensory receptors and sense organs detect stimuli from the internal and external environment and transmit this information to the central nervous system for processing.
General senses refer to the broad category of sensory information detected by receptors in the body and can be further grouped into somatic and visceral senses. Somatic sensations include touch, pressure, temperature, and pain and are essential for navigating our environment and...
3.5K
Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

638
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
638
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

149
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
149
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

815
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
815

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Adjustments of balance control during cognitive dual tasking: Evidence from event-related force-plate analysis.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

Crossmodal response precueing: age-related differences in action preparation.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2025
Same author

forceplate: An R package for processing raw force-plate time-series data.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Age-related Electrophysical Correlates of Cross-modal Attention Switching.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2024
Same author

Inhibition of cued but not executed task sets depends on cue-task compatibility and practice.

Psychological research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 9, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.3K

Modality compatibility in task switching depends on processing codes and task demands.

Erik Friedgen1, Iring Koch2, Denise Nadine Stephan2

  • 1Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jägerstr. 17/19, 52066, Aachen, Germany. erik.friedgen@psych.rwth-aachen.de.

Psychological Research
|September 8, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Modality compatibility in task switching influences cognitive control. Strengthening stimulus-response-effect coupling increases modality-specific interference, impacting performance.

More Related Videos

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
10:09

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

13.5K
Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 9, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.3K
Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
10:09

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

13.5K
Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Modality compatibility describes the congruence between sensory stimulus input and the anticipated sensory response output.
  • Previous research in task switching indicates higher switch costs when alternating between modality-incompatible stimulus-response mappings.
  • This suggests that incompatible mappings can lead to cross-task interference due to anticipated response effects priming competing stimulus modalities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether strengthening the auditory-vocal coupling enhances modality-compatibility effects in task switching.
  • To examine the role of stimulus properties (spatial-verbal vs. spatial-location) and task demands (temporal discrimination vs. spatial localization) in modulating modality-specific interference.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Compared modality-compatibility effects using spatial-verbal stimuli versus spatial-location stimuli to strengthen auditory-vocal coupling.
  • Experiment 2: Employed temporal stimulus discrimination versus spatial stimulus localization to manipulate response-effect anticipation.
  • Task switching paradigms were utilized to measure switch costs under varying modality compatibility conditions.

Main Results:

  • Both spatial-verbal stimuli (Experiment 1) and temporal discrimination tasks (Experiment 2) increased modality-specific task interference.
  • These manipulations effectively strengthened the response-effect coupling, leading to greater interference.
  • The findings demonstrate that variations in stimulus properties and task demands can modulate the strength of modality-specific interference in task switching.

Conclusions:

  • Modality-specific task interference in cognitive control processes, particularly during task switching, can be amplified by strengthening the response-effect coupling.
  • The results provide further evidence for the modality specificity of cognitive control mechanisms.
  • This research contributes to understanding how sensory and response characteristics influence cognitive flexibility and task performance.