Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Esteem and Culture01:26

Self-Esteem and Culture

147
Self-esteem, a core psychological construct, is intricately shaped by cultural context and varies significantly between collectivist and individualistic societies. In collectivist cultures such as Japan, self-esteem tends to be flexible, context-sensitive, and influenced by relationships. A Japanese student, for instance, may show restraint in formal settings like school but behave more openly among close friends, reflecting the flexible and dynamic nature of self-concept in such...
147
Cultural Influences on Personality01:26

Cultural Influences on Personality

586
Individualist and collectivist cultures emphasize different core values, shaping personality in distinct ways. In individualist cultures, such as those in the United States, England, and Australia, people prioritize independence, competition, and personal achievement. These societies tend to promote self-focused traits, with individuals often reporting higher levels of self-esteem. In contrast, collectivist cultures, commonly found in regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, emphasize...
586
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.5K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.5K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

35.8K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
35.8K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.7K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.7K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

31.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of acculturation on the ERP correlates of self- and other-referencing.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same author

Elevated functional magnetic resonance imaging activity in cognitively normal participants predicts future dementia.

Brain communications·2026
Same author

Identification of genetic modifiers of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: a genome-wide association study.

The Lancet. Neurology·2026
Same author

History of Traumatic Brain Injury with Loss of Consciousness and APOE <i>ε</i>4 Carriers Synergistically Increase Late-Life Amyloid PET Burden.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Screen Media Exposure and Inhibitory Control: A Longitudinal Study From Infancy to Toddlerhood.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2026
Same author

Brain volume trajectories in Down syndrome and autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
07:01

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children

Published on: March 1, 2019

8.3K

Cultural differences in performance on Eriksen's flanker task.

Angela Gutchess1, John Ksander2, Peter R Millar2,3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, MS 062, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA. gutchess@brandeis.edu.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|September 8, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cultural background impacts visual attention. Turks showed faster evidence accumulation and required more evidence than Americans in the Eriksen flanker task, affecting attentional allocation and resolution.

Keywords:
AttentionCognitionCross-culturalCultureFlankerVisual interference

More Related Videos

Conducting Concurrent Electroencephalography and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Recordings with a Flanker Task
13:18

Conducting Concurrent Electroencephalography and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Recordings with a Flanker Task

Published on: May 24, 2020

8.1K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
07:01

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children

Published on: March 1, 2019

8.3K
Conducting Concurrent Electroencephalography and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Recordings with a Flanker Task
13:18

Conducting Concurrent Electroencephalography and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Recordings with a Flanker Task

Published on: May 24, 2020

8.1K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Eriksen's zoom model posits a trade-off between attentional breadth and representational resolution.
  • Cultural influences on cognitive processes, particularly visual attention, remain underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how cultural background influences attentional allocation and resolution using Eriksen's flanker task.
  • To compare attentional differences between individuals from Eastern (Turks) and Western (Americans) cultures.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Eriksen's flanker task with variations in flanker spatial distance (Experiment 1) and flanker contrast (Experiment 2).
  • Employed evidence accumulation modeling to analyze speed-accuracy trade-offs in decision-making.
  • Recruited American and Turkish participants for cross-cultural comparison.

Main Results:

  • Flanker congruency and contrast interacted with cultural background, differentially affecting accuracy and reaction times.
  • Turkish participants demonstrated faster evidence accumulation and required more evidence compared to American participants.
  • Evidence suggests cultural variations in visual attention and decision-making strategies.

Conclusions:

  • Cultural background significantly modulates visual attention, influencing both attentional allocation and resolution.
  • Differences in evidence accumulation and decision criteria highlight cross-cultural variations in cognitive processing.
  • Findings have broad implications for understanding cultural impacts on attention and decision-making across diverse cognitive functions.