Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Will it work here? A realist approach to local decisions about implementing interventions evaluated as effective
Chris Bonell1, Audrey Prost2, G J Melendez-Torres3
1Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK chris.bonell@lshtm.ac.uk.
Local decision-makers need comprehensive evidence beyond effectiveness when transporting interventions. Assessing implementation, context, mechanisms, and local capacity ensures successful adoption and tailored solutions for new settings.
Area of Science:
- Implementation Science
- Public Health
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Growing interest in evidence required for transporting effective interventions to new settings.
- Limited attention on how local decision-makers choose between immediate implementation and further evaluation.
- School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) interventions serve as a case study.
Purpose of the Study:
- To inform decisions regarding the implementation of evidence-based interventions in new contexts.
- To guide local needs assessments for intervention adoption.
- To refine criteria for deciding between immediate implementation, piloting, or new trials.
Main Methods:
- Utilized realist evaluation principles to analyze decision-making processes.
- Examined evidence from process evaluations, mediation, moderation, and qualitative comparative analyses.
- Focused on assessing intervention effectiveness, implementation fidelity, contextual factors, and underlying mechanisms.
Main Results:
- Decisions require evaluating not just effectiveness, but also implementation processes, contextual influences, and mechanisms of action (for whom and why).
- Local needs assessments should consider the potential, capability, capacity, and contribution of the new setting.
- Assessing for similar 'aetiological mechanisms' underlying local adverse outcomes is crucial.
Conclusions:
- Uncertainty in feasibility necessitates implementation piloting.
- Uncertainty in triggering intended mechanisms warrants a new effectiveness trial.
- Uncertainty in mechanisms generating intended outcomes may require alternative interventions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Naturalistic Observations
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

