Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

254
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
254
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

439
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
439
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.1K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

458
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
458
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

773
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
773
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.3K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trust in Cancer Information Sources and Awareness of Human Papillomavirus as a Cause of Cervical Cancer Among US Adults.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Design for a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a school-based fruit and vegetable co-op on cardiometabolic health of children and parents in a persistent poverty area.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same author

Large-scale association study identifies lung cancer susceptibility copy number variants and their potential functional role in genetic instability.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Vaccination-Related Applications and Health Care Professionals' Observed Changes in Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Hesitancy: Cross-Sectional Survey.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth·2026
Same author

Effect of Yoga Practices on Postural Stability, Fall Risk, and Psychological Wellbeing in Older Adults.

Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Women's Preferences for Home-Based Self-Sampling or Clinic-Based Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening.

JAMA network open·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.0K

Differentiating anomalous disease intensity with confounding variables in space.

Chih-Chieh Wu1, Sanjay Shete2

  • 1Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan, 701, Taiwan. cc_wu@mail.ncku.edu.tw.

International Journal of Health Geographics
|September 15, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces novel statistical methods to identify and analyze geographical disease clusters, accounting for confounding variables. The findings help prioritize public health interventions by revealing hidden high-risk and low-risk areas.

Keywords:
Geographical disease clusterHierarchicalIncidence clusteringSudden infant death Syndrome

More Related Videos

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.9K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.0K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.9K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.2K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

Background:

  • Geographical disease clusters require etiological investigation and epidemicity analysis.
  • Identifying statistically significant disease clusters is a precursor to understanding underlying causes.
  • Statistical models incorporating confounding variables are crucial for dissecting the influence of known risk factors on disease clustering.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop statistical methods for hierarchical analysis of geographical disease clusters, differentiating between high and low incidence intensities.
  • To adjust for confounding variables, enabling a clearer understanding of disease patterns.
  • To apply these methods to spatial data of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in North Carolina, using race as a confounding variable.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed novel statistical methods for differentiating incidence intensity in geographical disease clusters hierarchically.
  • Incorporated adjustment for confounding variables (e.g., race) to refine cluster analysis.
  • Utilized a Poisson model for analyzing spatial occurrence data of SIDS.

Main Results:

  • The proposed Poisson model demonstrated superior performance compared to SMR-based models, especially in counties with no cases.
  • Racial distribution differences significantly explained previously identified high-intensity clusters.
  • The analysis revealed previously hidden low-intensity clusters and a small high-intensity cluster, suggesting the presence of unobserved spatially related risk factors.

Conclusions:

  • The developed methods provide hierarchical intensity information for adjusted disease clusters.
  • These insights enable better prioritization of regions for etiological studies and resource allocation.
  • The findings highlight the importance of accounting for confounding variables and spatial relationships in disease cluster analysis.