Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

A Murine Model of Fetal Exposure to Maternal Inflammation to Study the Effects of Acute Chorioamnionitis on Newborn Intestinal Development
Published on: June 24, 2020
Histopathology of the fetal inflammatory response to intra-amniotic pathogens
Carolyn M Salafia1, Dawn P Misra2
1Placental Analytics LLC, New Rochelle, New York, USA; Institute for Basic Research, Staten Island, New York, USA; New York Presbyterian- Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York, USA; Queens Hospital Center, Queens, New York, USA.
Obstetric endorsement of the utility of placental histologic examination remains infrequent, especially from obstetricians who do not have a placental pathologist as part of their own local clinical care team. Placental pathologic examinations are viewed as useless if they do not provide answers to urgent clinical questions. Increasingly, however, it is appreciated that while placental analysis should be considered with regard to its longer term value; results can assess lifelong risks of a wide range of diseases that have been tied to prenatal exposures (e.g., [1]), including distinguishing sex-specific differences in those risks. (e.g., [2]) This review will focus solely on acute fetal (?) inflammation, more specifically, the fetal neutrophil responses in umbilical cord, chorionic plate vessels and to some degree, the fetal system as a whole. This histologic fetal inflammatory response is often the most readily accessible aspect of "FIR" piece of FIRS (the fetal inflammatory response syndrome). Some researchers have defined FIRS by a combination of both cytokine (especially IL-6) levels and the histopathologic FIR (Musilova et al., 2018) [3]. As we and others have noted, many histology based FIR cases, even those associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes such as cerebral palsy, are clinically silent.(e.g., [4]) Current clinical diagnostic criteria may have high specificity as they are very good at identifying non-FIR cases. However, that high specificity is coupled with very low specificity, identifying only 10% of FIR (Doty et al., 2018 Jul) [5]. Our aim is to provide a conceptual framework for the readers of the journal to better understand how to answer the following questions: What is a neutrophil and how is it important in FIR? What is the differential diagnosis for histologic FIR? How long has there been FIR? What secondary processes may have been recruited (and when) to contribute to the final pathology and pathophysiology of the given pregnancy?
Obstetric endorsement of the utility of placental histologic examination remains infrequent, especially from obstetricians who do not have a placental pathologist as part of their own local clinical care team. Placental pathologic examinations are viewed as useless if they do not provide answers to urgent clinical questions. Increasingly, however, it is appreciated that while placental analysis should be considered with regard to its longer term value; results can assess lifelong risks of a wide range of diseases that have been tied to prenatal exposures (e.g., [1]), including distinguishing sex-specific differences in those risks. (e.g., [2]) This review will focus solely on acute fetal (?) inflammation, more specifically, the fetal neutrophil responses in umbilical cord, chorionic plate vessels and to some degree, the fetal system as a whole. This histologic fetal inflammatory response is often the most readily accessible aspect of "FIR" piece of FIRS (the fetal inflammatory response syndrome). Some researchers have defined FIRS by a combination of both cytokine (especially IL-6) levels and the histopathologic FIR (Musilova et al., 2018) [3]. As we and others have noted, many histology based FIR cases, even those associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes such as cerebral palsy, are clinically silent.(e.g., [4]) Current clinical diagnostic criteria may have high specificity as they are very good at identifying non-FIR cases. However, that high specificity is coupled with very low specificity, identifying only 10% of FIR (Doty et al., 2018 Jul) [5]. Our aim is to provide a conceptual framework for the readers of the journal to better understand how to answer the following questions: What is a neutrophil and how is it important in FIR? What is the differential diagnosis for histologic FIR? How long has there been FIR? What secondary processes may have been recruited (and when) to contribute to the final pathology and pathophysiology of the given pregnancy?
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Response I: Vascular and Cellular
Development of Immunocompetence
The initial cells that migrate from the fetal thymus settle within the skin and epithelial tissues lining the mouth, digestive tract, and in females, the uterus and vagina. These cells, including skin-based dendritic cells, serve as antigen-presenting cells, playing a key role in T cell activation.
Subsequent T...
Inflammatory Response II: Inflammatory Exudate and Tissue Repair
The typical wound exudate is odorless, transparent, straw-colored, thin, and watery. Exudate, however, can differ depending on the state of wound healing. Likewise, the...
Inflammatory Response
Inflammation can be triggered by various stimuli, such as impact, abrasion, chemical irritation, infections, and extreme hot or cold temperatures. These can damage cells and connective tissue fibers,...
Transcytosis of IgG
IgG molecules from a mother undergo transcytosis starting around 13 weeks of gestation. The amount of IgG transferred and entering the fetal blood circulation increases with...
Inflammation

