Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Immunoassay. Innovations in label technology.

J H Howanitz1

  • 1Laboratory Service, Wadsworth Veterans Administration Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90073.

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
|August 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Laboratory results. Timeliness as a quality attribute and strategy.

American journal of clinical pathology·2001
Same author

Production, analysis, and characterization of reference materials for prostate-specific antigen.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1995
Same author

Prostate specific antigen (PSA).

Disease markers·1993
Same author

Review of the influence of polypeptide hormone forms on immunoassay results.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1993
Same author

Toward meaningful blood usage review: comprehensive monitoring of physician practice.

QRB. Quality review bulletin·1987
Same author

Protein method influences on calculation of tissue receptor concentration.

American journal of clinical pathology·1986
Same journal

Assessing Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 in Urothelial Carcinoma: Insights From Clinical Practice Into Scoring Criteria, Histologic Subtypes, and Genomic Characteristics Across Disease Sites.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Cross-Reactivity of TPIT Antibody Clone OTI2G1 in Chordoma: Structural Mechanisms and Diagnostic Implications.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Paracoccidioidomycosis at Autopsy: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of Cytology Diagnosis for Well Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: Assessment by the College of American Pathologists Non-Gynecologic Slide Program.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Serum Immunofixation Electrophoresis Guidance Conflict: A Call to Harmonize.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

In Reply.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
See all related articles

Label technology in immunoassays has advanced significantly, with new enzyme, fluorescence, luminescent, and particle labels offering improved sensitivity and detection over traditional radioactivity. These innovations benefit both classic immunoassays and immunometric assays.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Immunoassay techniques are crucial for detecting and quantifying analytes.
  • Traditional label technologies, such as radioactivity, have limitations in terms of stability and detection.
  • Advancements in label technology are essential for improving immunoassay performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the historical development and recent advancements in label technology for immunoassays.
  • To compare the advantages and disadvantages of novel labels against traditional radioactive labels.
  • To discuss the application of new labels in both classic immunoassays and immunometric assays.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical and recent literature on immunoassay label technologies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of enzyme labels, including channeling techniques, enzyme acceptor-donor systems, and apoenzyme reactivation.
  • Exploration of fluorescence techniques like fluorescence polarization immunoassay and time-resolved fluorescence.
  • Examination of luminescent labels (e.g., acridinium esters) and particle labels (e.g., sol particles, liposomes).

    • Main Results:

    • Newer enzyme labels offer enhanced sensitivity and novel detection mechanisms.
    • Fluorescence techniques provide sensitive detection with improved instrumentation.
    • Luminescent labels demonstrate high stability, sensitivity, and ease of detection.
    • Particle labels, such as sol particles and liposomes, present innovative labeling strategies.

    Conclusions:

    • Novel label technologies offer significant advantages over traditional radioactive labels in terms of sensitivity, stability, and detection methods.
    • These advancements are applicable to a wide range of immunoassays, including classic and immunometric assays.
    • Continued innovation in label technology promises further improvements in diagnostic and analytical capabilities.