Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Global Climate Change01:50

Global Climate Change

28.2K
Throughout its ~4.5 billion year history, the Earth has experienced periods of warming and cooling. However, the current drastic increase in global temperatures is well outside of the Earth’s cyclic norms, and evidence for human-caused global climate change is compelling. Paleoclimatology, the study of ancient climate conditions, provides ample evidence for human-caused global climate change by comparing recent conditions with those in the past.
28.2K
What is Climate?01:16

What is Climate?

20.2K
Climate refers to the prevailing weather conditions in a specific area over an extended period. As the saying goes, “Climate is what you expect. Weather is what you get.” Climate is influenced by geographic factors, such as latitude, terrain, and proximity to bodies of water.
20.2K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.5K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.5K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

11.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.9K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.3K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

996
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
996

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Many but not all pathogen-associated molecular patterns aggravate neurogenic heterotopic ossification after spinal cord injury.

Journal of biomedical science·2026
Same author

A glucocorticoid spike derails muscle repair to heterotopic ossification after spinal cord injury.

Cell reports. Medicine·2024
Same author

A framework for understanding the human experience of nature through cognitive mapping.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2024
Same author

Trust and trustworthy artificial intelligence: A research agenda for AI in the environmental sciences.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2023
Same author

Measuring Spatial Associations between Environmental Health and Beliefs about Environmental Governance.

Environmental management·2022
Same author

Lymphocytes Are Not Required for Neurogenic Heterotopic Ossification Development after Spinal Cord Injury.

Neurotrauma reports·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions
06:10

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions

Published on: March 31, 2023

1.3K

Indiscriminate, Irrelevant, and Sometimes Wrong: Causal Misconceptions about Climate Change.

Whitney Fleming1, Adam L Hayes2,3, Katherine M Crosman2,4

  • 1Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|September 16, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Misconceptions about climate change causes, such as pollution or ozone depletion, are common. Belief in "green" causes increases policy support, while belief in natural variability decreases it.

Keywords:
Climate changemental modelsrisk perceptions

More Related Videos

Exploring the Effects of Atmospheric Forcings on Evaporation: Experimental Integration of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer and Shallow Subsurface
13:27

Exploring the Effects of Atmospheric Forcings on Evaporation: Experimental Integration of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer and Shallow Subsurface

Published on: June 8, 2015

9.0K
Simulating Temperature in a Soil Incubation Experiment
08:39

Simulating Temperature in a Soil Incubation Experiment

Published on: October 28, 2022

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions
06:10

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions

Published on: March 31, 2023

1.3K
Exploring the Effects of Atmospheric Forcings on Evaporation: Experimental Integration of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer and Shallow Subsurface
13:27

Exploring the Effects of Atmospheric Forcings on Evaporation: Experimental Integration of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer and Shallow Subsurface

Published on: June 8, 2015

9.0K
Simulating Temperature in a Soil Incubation Experiment
08:39

Simulating Temperature in a Soil Incubation Experiment

Published on: October 28, 2022

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental psychology
  • Climate change communication
  • Public opinion research

Background:

  • Widespread misconceptions about climate change causes persist.
  • These include beliefs that pollution or ozone depletion cause climate change, or that natural variability drives current trends.
  • Such beliefs can impact public support for climate change mitigation policies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the prevalence of climate change misconceptions in the U.S.
  • To determine if these misconceptions influence concern and policy support.
  • To analyze the relationship between specific causal beliefs and policy support.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized national interview (N=77) and survey (N=1,013, N=1,820) data from the United States.
  • Employed regression and mediation analyses to examine belief-policy support relationships.
  • Controlled for general knowledge, political ideology, and other relevant factors.

Main Results:

  • Over a third of interviewees held at least one misconception.
  • Beliefs linking "environmental problems" (pollution, ozone depletion) to climate change were associated with a 25% higher probability of policy support.
  • Belief in natural climate variability as a major cause was linked to a 7% lower probability of policy support.

Conclusions:

  • Misconceptions about climate change causes are prevalent and vary by political ideology.
  • Believing "green" causes increases policy support, suggesting a potential pathway for engagement.
  • Believing natural variability is a primary driver reduces policy support, highlighting a barrier to effective climate action.