Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

1.1K
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
1.1K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

4.3K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
4.3K
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

7.4K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
7.4K
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

411
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
411
Microsoft Excel: Pearson's Correlation01:18

Microsoft Excel: Pearson's Correlation

1.6K
Microsoft Excel is a powerful tool for statistical analysis, including calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient, which measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two continuous variables. Pearson's correlation coefficient, often denoted as "r," ranges from -1 to 1. A value close to 1 indicates a strong positive correlation, meaning as one variable increases, the other does too. A value close to -1 indicates a strong negative correlation, implying...
1.6K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

7.8K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
7.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of icosapent ethyl treatment on colorectal tissue marine omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid levels among patients with a history of adenoma: a prospective, single-arm clinical trial.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same author

A multi-state survival model to identify risk factors for lethal ovarian cancer.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Associations of alcohol use with expression of stromal markers in benign breast biopsy samples.

British journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Reliability of stromal markers multiplex immunofluorescent staining: pathologist assessment compared to quantitative image analysis.

American journal of cancer research·2026
Same author

Associations of oral contraceptives with expression of CD44, CD24, and ALDH1A1 stem cell markers in women with benign breast biopsies.

Breast cancer research : BCR·2026
Same author

Non-medical drivers of health and imaging patterns in intimate partner violence.

Emergency radiology·2026
Same journal

Dual-Hit Myopia Mechanism Unveiled by Multi-Omics: Opn1mw Deficiency Primed the Retina for Exaggerated Response to Environmental Defocus.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Psychometric Performance of Children With Amblyopia During a Tablet-Based Adaptive Visual Acuity Assessment.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

The Molecular Basis of Ocular Aging: Mechanisms, Pathologies, and Emerging Therapeutics.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Sensory Eye Dominance Remains Stable Across Binocular Combination and Rivalry in Normal and Anisometropic Amblyopic Vision.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Exosome-Associated Gene Network and the Role of SPP1 in Herpes Stromal Keratitis and the Therapeutic Modulation by Ursolic Acid.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Nonlinear Associations of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate With Incident Age-Related Eye Diseases: Implications for Metabolic Risk Stratification.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.7K

Calculating Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values for Correlated Eye Data.

Gui-Shuang Ying1, Maureen G Maguire1, Robert J Glynn2

  • 1Center for Preventive Ophthalmology and Biostatistics, Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|September 16, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate statistical methods like GEE and cluster bootstrap are crucial for analyzing correlated eye data in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) detection. Ignoring inter-eye correlation leads to unreliable confidence intervals, impacting diagnostic accuracy.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Establishing a Practical and Cost-Effective Protocol for Corneal Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Settings
04:00

Author Spotlight: Establishing a Practical and Cost-Effective Protocol for Corneal Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Settings

Published on: August 2, 2024

2.9K
Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum
07:30

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Published on: March 21, 2019

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.7K
Author Spotlight: Establishing a Practical and Cost-Effective Protocol for Corneal Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Settings
04:00

Author Spotlight: Establishing a Practical and Cost-Effective Protocol for Corneal Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Settings

Published on: August 2, 2024

2.9K
Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum
07:30

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Published on: March 21, 2019

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) detection often involves examining both eyes of an infant.
  • Inter-eye correlation in ocular data can affect the statistical validity of diagnostic test evaluations.
  • Accurate estimation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values is vital for clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and validate statistical methods for estimating diagnostic accuracy metrics in the presence of correlated ocular data.
  • To compare the performance of generalized estimating equations (GEE) and cluster bootstrap methods against traditional approaches for correlated eye data.
  • To highlight the impact of inter-eye correlation on the precision of confidence intervals for sensitivity and specificity.

Main Methods:

  • Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) were employed to model correlated data from both eyes.
  • Cluster bootstrap resampling was utilized to estimate confidence intervals, accounting for inter-eye dependency.
  • Data from a clinical study on telemedicine for ROP detection were used for application and comparison.

Main Results:

  • Per-eye analysis for ROP detection yielded a sensitivity of 83.7% and specificity of 86.8%.
  • Methods accounting for inter-eye correlation (GEE, cluster bootstrap) produced wider, more reliable confidence intervals compared to naïve approaches.
  • Analyzing eyes separately resulted in significantly wider confidence intervals, indicating inefficiency.

Conclusions:

  • Statistical analyses of ocular data should account for inter-eye correlation using methods like GEE or cluster bootstrap.
  • Ignoring this correlation leads to inappropriately narrow confidence intervals, potentially overestimating precision.
  • Separate analysis of each eye is statistically inefficient and should be avoided when data are correlated.