Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025
Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement
Published on: September 13, 2022
Comparison of the accuracy of implant position for two-implants supported fixed dental prosthesis using static and
Paweena Yimarj1, Keskanya Subbalekha1, Kanit Dhanesuan1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Background:
Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) can facilitate accuracy of single implant placement, but little is known with regards to parallelism between multiple implants.
Purpose:
To compare the accuracy of position and parallelism of two implants, using static and dynamic CAIS systems.
Materials And Methods:
Thirty patients received two implants (60 implants) randomly allocated to two different CAIS systems. Optimal implant position and absolute parallelism was planned based on preoperative cone beam CT (CBCT). Patients received implants with a surgical guide (static CAIS, n = 30) or real-time navigation (dynamic CAIS, n = 30). Implant three-dimensional deviation and parallelism was calculated after surgery.
Results:
The mean 3D deviation in the static and dynamic CAIS group at implant platform were 1.04 ± 0.67 vs 1.24 ± 0.39 mm, at apex were 1.54 ± 0.79 vs 1.58 ± 0.56 mm and angulation were 4.08° ± 1.69° vs 3.78° ± 1.84°, respectively. The angle deviations between two placed implants (parallelism) in static and dynamic CAIS groups were 4.32° ± 2.44° and 3.55° ± 2.29°, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in all parameters between groups.
Conclusion:
Static and dynamic CAIS provides similar accuracy of the 3D implant position and parallelism between two implants.
