Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Demand for Cancer Screening Services: Results From Randomized Controlled Discrete Choice Experiments
Marcel Bilger1, Semra Özdemir2, Eric A Finkelstein3
1Health Economics and Policy, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria; Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Financial protection for positive cancer screenings and correcting survival misconceptions are more effective than screening subsidies for increasing uptake. This impacts public health strategies for cancer prevention.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Economics
- Cancer Prevention
Background:
- Low uptake of cancer screening services is a significant global public health challenge.
- Understanding factors influencing screening decisions is crucial for improving cancer prevention strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate factors influencing women's decisions regarding cancer screening (mammography and Pap smear) in Singapore.
- To evaluate the impact of screening/treatment subsidies and gain-framed messages on screening uptake.
Main Methods:
- Discrete choice experiments were used to analyze preferences for mammography and Pap smear among women.
- Respondents were randomly exposed to a gain-framed public health message promoting screening benefits.
Main Results:
- The gain-framed message did not significantly influence stated screening uptake.
- Respondents prioritized treatment attributes (effectiveness, out-of-pocket costs) over screening attributes (monetary incentives).
- Underestimation of survival chances for screen-detected breast and cervical cancers was observed.
Conclusions:
- Correcting misconceptions about cancer prognosis post-screening may be more effective than direct screening subsidies.
- Enhancing financial protection for individuals testing positive could increase screening uptake cost-effectively.
- Public health interventions should consider both patient perceptions and financial implications.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
What is an Experiment?
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs