Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Building the Next Generation of Researchers: Mentored Training in Dissemination and Implementation Science
Ross C Brownson1, Rebekah R Jacob2, Bobbi J Carothers3
1R.C. Brownson is Steven H. and Susan U. Lipstein Distinguished Professor of Public Health, Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center and Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
The Mentored Training for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Cancer (MT-DIRC) program significantly enhanced scholars' dissemination and implementation (D&I) skills and expanded their professional networks. This training is crucial for applying cancer control interventions effectively.
Area of Science:
- Dissemination and Implementation Science
- Cancer Control Research
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) science is vital for bridging the gap between evidence-based interventions and their real-world application.
- Effective D&I strategies are needed to improve cancer prevention and control outcomes.
- Postdoctoral and early-career scholars require specialized training to conduct D&I research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of the Mentored Training for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Cancer (MT-DIRC) program.
- To assess changes in mentoring, D&I skills, and network composition among cancer scholars.
- To determine the effectiveness of a structured D&I training program for early-career researchers.
Main Methods:
- A quasi-experimental design was employed over a 2-year training institute.
- Data collected included mentor competencies, mentee satisfaction with mentoring, and self-rated D&I skills.
- Social network analysis assessed changes in contact, mentoring, and collaboration networks.
Main Results:
- Mentors demonstrated high competence, and satisfaction gaps in mentoring areas decreased.
- Fellows showed significant self-reported improvements in D&I skills across all domains (42.5%-52.9% increase).
- Mentorship and collaboration networks expanded, with notable increases in scholarly manuscript and research project ties.
Conclusions:
- Mentored training effectively builds D&I skills and professional networks for cancer scholars.
- This approach enhances the capacity to implement evidence-based interventions in cancer control.
- Investing in D&I training is essential for advancing cancer prevention and control research.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...