Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Using the Red Cross wound classification to predict treatment needs in children with conflict-related limb injuries:
Lisanne van Gennip1, Frederike J C Haverkamp2, Måns Muhrbeck3
1Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Insights
The Red Cross wound grade effectively predicts treatment needs for pediatric extremity wounds in conflict zones. Higher grades correlate with increased surgeries, transfusions, and hospital stays, aiding clinical decisions.
Area of Science:
- Trauma surgery
- Pediatric emergency medicine
- Global health
Background:
- The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) developed the Red Cross wound classification (RCWC) for rapid wound severity assessment in conflict.
- The RCWC is subdivided into grades 1, 2, and 3, representing low, major, and massive energy transfer to injured tissue, respectively.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the correlation between the Red Cross wound grade and patient outcomes in pediatric conflict-related extremity injuries.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 2463 pediatric patients (<15 years) treated for conflict-related penetrating extremity injuries at ICRC hospitals (1988-2014).
- Assessed correlations between Red Cross wound grades and number of surgeries, blood transfusions, hospitalization duration, and mortality.
- Performed stratification analyses to identify potential effect modifiers.
Main Results:
- Higher Red Cross wound grades significantly correlated with increased need for surgeries, blood transfusions, and longer hospitalizations.
- Grade 1 patients required a median of 2 surgeries, while Grade 3 patients required a median of 3.
- Hospitalization duration increased from a median of 15 days for Grade 1 to 40 days for Grade 3.
Conclusions:
- The Red Cross wound grade independently correlates with treatment requirements for pediatric extremity wounds in conflict settings.
- This classification system can aid clinical decision-making and should be integrated into the assessment of weapon-injured pediatric patients.
- While mortality rates did not differ significantly, the grade's utility in predicting resource needs is established.
Background:
The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) implemented the Red Cross wound classification (RCWC) to quickly assess the severity of a wound in conflict settings. A subdivision into wound grades derived from the RCWC consists of grades 1, 2, and 3, and represents low, major, and massive energy transfer, respectively, to the injured tissue. The aim of this observational study is to assess whether the Red Cross wound grade of a pediatric patient's wound correlates with patient outcomes.
Methods:
All pediatric patients (age < 15 years) treated in an ICRC hospital between 1988 and 2014 for conflict-related penetrating extremity injuries were retroactively included. Correlations were assessed between wound grades and number of surgeries, blood transfusions, days hospitalized, and mortality. Stratification analyses were performed to evaluate potential effect modifiers.
Results:
The study included 2463 pediatric patients. Pediatric patients with a higher wound grade received significantly more surgeries (grade 1 median 2; grade 3 median 3), more blood transfusions (grades 1 and 3 received 33.9 and 72.2 units per 100 patients, respectively), and were hospitalized longer (grade 1 median 15; grade 3 median 40 days). Mortality rates did not significantly differ. Stratification analyses did not reveal effect modifiers for the association between wound grades and patient outcomes.
Conclusion:
The Red Cross wound grade of a pediatric patient's extremity wound correlates independently with treatment needs. This simple wound grading system could support clinical decision-making and should be integrated into the clinical assessment of weapon-wounded pediatric patients in conflict settings.

