Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

33.7K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
33.7K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

22.8K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.8K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

43.5K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
43.5K
Natural Selection and Adaptation01:15

Natural Selection and Adaptation

1.0K
Natural selection, a fundamental concept in evolutionary biology, is the mechanism by which evolution is driven, favoring organisms that are best adapted to their environments. This process enhances their chances of survival and reproduction. Adaptation, a key outcome of this process, involves genetic modifications that optimize an organism's functionality under specific environmental challenges, such as extreme cold or thinner air at high altitudes.
Beyond physical adaptations,...
1.0K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

7.8K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
7.8K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

3.3K
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adverse Drug Reactions in the Exotic Animal Patient.

The veterinary clinics of North America. Exotic animal practice·2026
Same author

Multimodal blood based proteomic profiling reveals insights into mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

IL-6 in Checkpoint Myocarditis: A Promising Biomarker and Therapeutic Target.

JACC. CardioOncology·2026
Same author

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Northern Tree Shrew (Tupaia belangeri).

Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS·2026
Same author

Chromatin architecture sets origin licensing capacity.

Research square·2026
Same author

Chromatin architecture sets origin licensing capacity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.5K

Application of simultaneous selective pressures slows adaptation.

Lauren M F Merlo1, Kathleen Sprouffske2, Taylor C Howard3

  • 1Lankenau Institute for Medical Research Wynnewood Pennsylvania USA.

Evolutionary Applications
|September 21, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Applying multiple selective pressures simultaneously slows adaptation in yeast. This finding suggests that increasing evolutionary pressures could potentially slow disease progression in contexts like cancer and infectious diseases.

Keywords:
adaptationcancer therapyclonal interferencefunctional interferenceslowing evolution

More Related Videos

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications
07:37

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications

Published on: January 19, 2018

19.2K
Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat
06:03

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Published on: September 20, 2016

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.5K
Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications
07:37

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications

Published on: January 19, 2018

19.2K
Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat
06:03

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Published on: September 20, 2016

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Microbiology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Beneficial mutations in asexual populations can compete, affecting adaptation rates.
  • Simultaneous selective pressures may increase mutation competition, potentially slowing adaptation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how multiple selective pressures affect the rate of adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  • To compare fitness increases under single versus multiple nutrient limitations.

Main Methods:

  • Evolved Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for ~500 generations under one or three limiting nutrient pressures (glucose, histidine, uracil).
  • Measured evolved relative fitness using competition assays.
  • Utilized high-throughput sequencing to identify mechanisms of fitness changes.

Main Results:

  • Populations under single selective pressures showed significant fitness increases.
  • Populations under three selective pressures did not show statistically significant fitness increases on any single pressure compared to the ancestral strain.
  • Simultaneously limiting three nutrients slowed the rate of evolution on any single pressure relative to single-pressure evolution.

Conclusions:

  • Multiple selective pressures can significantly slow the rate of adaptation in yeast.
  • This principle may have implications for managing diseases like cancer and infectious diseases by slowing progression and prolonging drug efficacy.