Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

43.3K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
43.3K
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design01:28

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design

1.5K
Drug design is a dynamic field that involves discovering and developing new medications based on specific biological targets. This process heavily relies on structure-activity relationships (SAR) and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) to guide the design and optimization of efficient drugs.
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
1.5K
Predicting Reaction Outcomes02:24

Predicting Reaction Outcomes

9.6K
Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
9.6K
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination02:52

Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination

13.5K
When a nucleophile and an alkyl halide react, nucleophilic substitution and β-elimination reactions compete to generate products.
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
13.5K
Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN202:27

Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN2

15.5K
Nucleophilic substitution reactions of alkyl halides can proceed via an SN1 or an SN2 mechanism. While in SN2 reactions, the nucleophile attacks the substrate simultaneously as the leaving group departs, in SN1 reactions, the substrate first dissociates to give the carbocation intermediate. Various factors such as the structure of the substrate, the strength of the nucleophile, and the nature of the solvent promote one mechanism over the other.
With increased substitution on the alkyl halide,...
15.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Promising Room-Temperature Superconductor in the La-Sc-H System at High Pressure.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Structure-Induced Spin Switching in Triple-Decker Metal-Ring-Metal Nanoclusters.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Pressure-Induced Electronic Topological Transition and Superconducting Transition in Two-Dimensional Topological Insulator GeBi<sub>2</sub>Te<sub>4</sub>.

Inorganic chemistry·2026
Same author

Coupled Electronic and Structural Dynamics Enable Spin Switching in Endohedral Fullerenes.

Inorganic chemistry·2026
Same author

Transient Laser-Induced Magnetic Order and Relaxation Pathways in TiCrCT<sub>2</sub> (<i>T</i> = O, F) MXenes.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Observation of Superconductivity above 200 K in Pressure-Stabilized Cubic (Y,Ce)H<sub>10</sub>.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

732

Combining Machine Learning Potential and Structure Prediction for Accelerated Materials Design and Discovery.

Qunchao Tong1,2, Pengyue Gao1, Hanyu Liu1,3,4

  • 1International Center for Computational Method & Software, College of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
|September 21, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Theoretical structure prediction using quantum mechanics is powerful but computationally expensive. Machine learning potentials (MLP) offer an efficient alternative for atomistic simulations, combining speed with accuracy for materials science discovery.

More Related Videos

Scalable Nanohelices for Predictive Studies and Enhanced 3D Visualization
08:03

Scalable Nanohelices for Predictive Studies and Enhanced 3D Visualization

Published on: November 12, 2014

10.8K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

732
Scalable Nanohelices for Predictive Studies and Enhanced 3D Visualization
08:03

Scalable Nanohelices for Predictive Studies and Enhanced 3D Visualization

Published on: November 12, 2014

10.8K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.4K

Area of Science:

  • Computational materials science
  • Quantum mechanics
  • Machine learning in chemistry

Background:

  • Atomistic simulations using density functional theory (DFT) are standard for predicting material structures.
  • DFT's computational cost limits its scalability for large, realistic systems.
  • Machine learning potentials (MLP) have emerged as a computationally efficient alternative for atomistic simulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce the integration of structure prediction with machine learning potentials (MLP).
  • To highlight the advantages and basic principles of combining these methods.
  • To discuss the challenges and future opportunities in this interdisciplinary field.

Main Methods:

  • Leveraging quantum mechanical principles for theoretical structure prediction.
  • Employing machine learning potentials (MLP) to overcome computational cost limitations of DFT.
  • Exploring the synergy between established simulation techniques and novel ML approaches.

Main Results:

  • MLP significantly enhances the efficiency of atomistic simulations.
  • The combination of structure prediction and MLP enables more complex and realistic material modeling.
  • This approach accelerates the discovery of novel physical and chemical systems.

Conclusions:

  • The fusion of structure prediction and MLP represents a significant advancement in computational materials science.
  • Addressing current challenges will unlock broader applications of this powerful methodology.
  • This perspective outlines a promising future for accelerated materials discovery and design.