Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.

Muscle Coordination and Action

Muscle Coordination and Action

Muscle coordination is a complex and finely tuned process essential for smooth and purposeful movements like flexion, extension, adduction, abduction, and rotation. The human body orchestrates the actions of various muscles working in concert, each with a specific role. Four functional types describe how muscles work together: agonist, antagonist, synergist, and fixator.
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement....

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Predicting Musculoskeletal Adverse Events During Moderate- to High-Intensity Walking Training in Chronic Stroke.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Same author

Working Together: Synergistic Predictors of Dyadic Performance in a Shared Force-Production Task.

Motor control·2026

Same author

Environmental consistency, not certainty, governs predictive motor strategies in human walking.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026

Same author

The Effects of Neuromuscular Training and Additive Visual Biofeedback on Landing Biomechanics and Sensorimotor Brain Activity in Young Female Athletes.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise·2026

Same author

An automatic, simple ultrasound biofeedback parameter for distinguishing accurate and misarticulated rhotic syllables.

Interspeech·2026

Same author

Participatory Design: Addressing Speech-Language Pathologists' Challenges through Collaborative Interface Design.

Design issues·2025

Same journal

Associations between movement behaviors, sleep, and screen time exposure in middle childhood using multivariable modelling.

Human movement science·2026

Same journal

The interaction of biomechanical demands and the speed-accuracy trade-off for the control of multi-directional, three-dimensional targeted reaching movements.

Human movement science·2026

Same journal

Think positive, perform better: The detrimental effect of technical motor imagery before action.

Human movement science·2026

Same journal

Shoulder-elbow coordination in the transverse plane during badminton forehand drive depending on training status using vector coding analysis.

Human movement science·2026

Same journal

Delayed reaction time and altered spatial activation of Fibularis longus in chronic ankle instability: A high-density surface electromyography study.

Human movement science·2026

Same journal

Observed teacher-child interaction quality as a predictor of motor competence in preschoolers: A sex-differentiated analysis.

Human movement science·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

Early learning differences between intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination.

Colin T Annand¹, Francis M Grover², Paula L Silva²

¹Center for Cognition, Action, & Perception, Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; The Complexity Group, Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Human Movement Science

|September 24, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Individuals learn new coordination patterns faster alone than with a partner due to stronger intrinsic dynamics. However, initial partner performance is better, with individuals overcoming interference with practice.

More Related Videos

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Published on: March 21, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Published on: March 21, 2019

Area of Science:

Motor control
Human coordination dynamics
Neuroscience

Background:

Intrinsic coordination patterns are inherently stable and influence learning.
Intrapersonal interlimb coordination dynamics are stronger than interpersonal ones.
This difference in coupling strength impacts learning new coordination patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how coupling strength differences affect learning new coordination patterns.
To compare learning interference from intrinsic dynamics in intrapersonal versus interpersonal contexts.
To determine the impact of intrinsic coordination tendencies on motor skill acquisition.

Main Methods:

Participants learned a new coordination pattern individually (intrapersonal) and in pairs (interpersonal).
Learning involved controlling cursor position to trace a target, implicitly acquiring the pattern.
Performance was measured to assess learning trajectories and interference effects.

Main Results:

Dyads (pairs) showed better initial performance on the first trial.
Individuals demonstrated steeper learning trajectories over time.
Individuals experienced greater interference from intrinsic dynamics early in learning.

Conclusions:

Stronger intrinsic coordination dynamics in individuals cause initial learning interference.
Despite initial challenges, individuals can overcome interference and match paired performance with practice.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial for designing effective motor learning interventions.