Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans
Published on: April 28, 2022
Evaluating the Positive Drinking Consequences Questionnaire: Support for a Four-Factor Structure and Measurement
Hallie R Jordan1, Mallorie G Carroll1, Richard S Mohn1
1The University of Southern Mississippi.
The Positive Drinking Consequences Questionnaire (PDCQ) reveals four distinct types of positive drinking outcomes. Understanding these nuances is key for targeted alcohol prevention and intervention strategies.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Addiction Research
- Substance Use Studies
Background:
- Positive drinking consequences are often overlooked in alcohol research.
- Existing measures may not fully capture the multifaceted nature of these experiences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To psychometrically evaluate the 14-item Positive Drinking Consequences Questionnaire (PDCQ).
- To explore the factor structure, validity, and reliability of the PDCQ in college students.
Main Methods:
- Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on data from 1,088 college students.
- Measurement invariance, criterion-related validity, and internal consistency were assessed.
Main Results:
- A four-factor model (Sociability, Tension Reduction, Liquid Courage, Sexual Enhancement) was supported, loading onto a higher-order PDCQ factor.
- The PDCQ demonstrated measurement invariance across gender.
- PDCQ scores correlated positively with alcohol use and negatively with protective strategies.
Conclusions:
- Positive drinking consequences are more complex than previously thought.
- The PDCQ provides a nuanced measure of these consequences.
- Identifying specific positive drinking consequences can improve prevention and intervention efforts.
More Related Videos
09:00Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
Published on: August 16, 2024
08:27Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Factorial Design
Reliability and Validity
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Five-Factor Theory of Personality
Openness reflects creativity, curiosity, and openness to new experiences. Individuals scoring high in openness are imaginative, have a wide range of interests, and are independent...
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test: