Correction to Rodriguez-Stanley et al. (2020).
Jacqueline Rodriguez-Stanley1, María Alonso-Ferres2, Samuele Zilioli1
1Department of Psychology.
Summary
Perceived fairness in housework distribution impacts relationship quality and health, particularly for lower socioeconomic status (SES) individuals. Housework hours indirectly affect well-being through fairness perceptions, especially in lower SES groups.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Sociology
- Family Studies
Background:
- Household chores are often viewed as undesirable but necessary tasks.
- Previous research links housework hours and perceived fairness to relationship quality and well-being.
- Equity Theory and Reserve Capacity Model provide theoretical frameworks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate perceived fairness as a mediator between housework hours and long-term outcomes.
- To examine socioeconomic status (SES) as a moderator in these relationships.
- To assess effects on relationship quality, well-being, physical health, and sleep quality.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from 2,644 married and cohabiting adults in the Midlife Development in the U.S. study.
- Utilized moderated mediation analysis.
- Controlled for age, sex, and paid work hours.
Main Results:
- Significant indirect effects of housework hours on well-being, marital quality, physical health, and sleep dysfunction were found through perceived fairness.
- These effects were significant only for individuals with lower socioeconomic status (SES).
- No significant indirect effects were observed for individuals with higher SES.
Conclusions:
- Perceived fairness in housework is a crucial psychological mechanism linking chore distribution to health and relationship outcomes.
- Socioeconomic status (SES) significantly influences the impact of housework on well-being and health.
- Interventions addressing fairness in housework may be particularly beneficial for lower SES populations.
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
Overview
Cross-reactivity
Overview
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.In the early 20th century,...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:


