Defining a Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Lumbar Tubular

Trent A Vanhorn1,1, Ziyad O Knio1,1, Tadhg J O'Gara1,2,1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Abstract

Insights

This study defines minimum clinically important difference (MCID) values for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in lumbar tubular microdecompression (LTMD) surgery. These MCID values help interpret surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction after LTMD procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Orthopedics
  • Health Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are crucial for assessing surgical success.
  • Interpreting PROM score changes requires defining a minimum clinically important difference (MCID).
  • This study focuses on PROMs for lumbar tubular microdecompression (LTMD).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define the MCID for key PROMs in LTMD patients.
  • To establish patient-centered benchmarks for surgical outcomes.
  • To evaluate the EuroQol-Five Dimensions (EQ-5D) index, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analog scales (VAS) for leg and low back pain.

Main Methods:

  • An anchor-based approach using patient satisfaction was employed.
  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed on 235 LTMD patients.
  • PROMs were collected preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up.

Main Results:

  • MCID for EQ-5D index: 0.219.
  • MCID for ODI: 15.0–16.5.
  • MCID for leg pain VAS: 0.5; low back pain VAS: 2.5–3.5.

Conclusions:

  • Established MCID values provide meaningful interpretation of PROM changes after LTMD.
  • The EQ-5D index shows potential as a valuable tool in spine surgery outcome assessment.
  • Further research into the EQ-5D index may support its use alongside routine PROMs.

Related Concept Videos