Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

7.0K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.0K
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

6.0K
Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
6.0K
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

43.1K
Overview
43.1K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.1K
Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

42.5K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
42.5K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

22.8K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Complex and dynamic population structures: Synthesis, open questions, and future directions.

Soft computing·2025
Same author

Identifying fish populations prone to abrupt shifts via dynamical footprint analysis.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Robust genetic codes enhance protein evolvability.

PLoS biology·2024
Same author

Mutation and Selection Induce Correlations between Selection Coefficients and Mutation Rates.

The American naturalist·2023
Same author

Developmental Selection and the Perception of Mutation Bias.

Molecular biology and evolution·2023
Same author

Environment-dependent epistasis increases phenotypic diversity in gene regulatory networks.

Science advances·2023
Same journal

Another 10 years of PLOS Computational Biology: A data-driven reflection on trends in genomics research.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Mobility data resolution needed to inform predictive models of spatial epidemic spread from mobile phone data.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

DeepMethylation: A deep learning framework for tissue-specific DNA methylation prediction and functional variant annotation.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Redefining and estimating the early-phase reproduction ratio for epidemic outbreaks in spatially structured populations.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Optimized phenotype definitions boost GWAS power.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Detection, communication, and individual identification with deep audio embeddings: A case study with North Atlantic right whales.

PLoS computational biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.2K

Mutation bias interacts with composition bias to influence adaptive evolution.

Alejandro V Cano1,2, Joshua L Payne1,2

  • 1Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.

Plos Computational Biology
|September 28, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mutation bias significantly impacts adaptive evolution by interacting with landscape composition. This interaction affects evolutionary predictability, genetic diversity, and robustness, using real-world data.

More Related Videos

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

4.0K
Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat
06:03

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Published on: September 20, 2016

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.2K
Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

4.0K
Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat
06:03

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Published on: September 20, 2016

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Genetics
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Mutation is a stochastic process with inherent biases, influencing evolutionary trajectories.
  • Previous studies often relied on synthetic landscapes, limiting real-world applicability.
  • Understanding mutation bias in empirical settings is crucial for evolutionary insights.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of mutation bias on adaptive evolution of DNA-binding affinity.
  • To analyze interactions between mutation bias and landscape composition using empirical data.
  • To assess the impact on evolutionary predictability, genetic diversity, and robustness.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized 746 empirical genotype-phenotype landscapes of transcription factor-DNA binding affinity.
  • Analyzed mutation types and frequencies within these empirical landscapes.
  • Examined the interplay of mutation bias and landscape composition under varying population genetic conditions.

Main Results:

  • Empirical landscapes exhibit composition bias, independent of mutation process bias.
  • Composition bias interacts with mutation biases, affecting adaptive evolution.
  • The interaction influences evolutionary predictability, genetic diversity, and mutational robustness.

Conclusions:

  • Mutation bias and landscape composition are critical interacting factors in adaptive evolution.
  • Empirical data reveals complex dynamics not fully captured by synthetic models.
  • Findings provide a more nuanced understanding of evolutionary processes in biological systems.