Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

15.2K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Active Inference Models of AV Takeovers: Relating Model Parameters to Trust, Situation Awareness, and Fatigue.

Human factors·2024
Same author

One Procedure Change Process, Two Interpretations: A Qualitative Exploration of Differences in User and Administrative Perceptions.

IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors·2024
Same author

Driving among individuals with chronic conditions: A systematic review of applied research using kinematic driving sensors.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2024
Same author

An Experimental Investigation of Hazard Statement Compliance in Procedures Using Eye Tracking Technology: Should Task be Included in the C-HIP Model?

Human factors·2023
Same author

Workers' Acceptance of Digital Procedures: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model.

IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors·2023
Same author

Naturalistic observations of multiteam interaction networks: Implications for cognition in crisis management teams.

Ergonomics·2023
Same journal

Effects of Task Priority and Difficulty in Multitasking Across Screens.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Effects of Egocentric and Exocentric Supervisor Viewpoint Perspectives on Motion Plan Legibility and Decision Support in Automated Spacecraft Docking Maneuvers.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

System-Wide Trust (SWT) Versus Component-Specific Trust (CST) in Multi-Agent Human-Agent Teams: Individual Variability in Trust Bias.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Driver Adaptation to Partially Automated Driving in Urban Environments: Effects of Repeated Exposure and System Capabilities on Drivers' Trust, Monitoring, and Response.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

Human factors·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.6K

Predicting Procedure Step Performance From Operator and Text Features: A Critical First Step Toward Machine

Anthony D McDonald1, Nilesh Ade1, S Camille Peres1

  • 1Texas A&M University, USA.

Human Factors
|September 29, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning accurately predicts procedure performance using operator and text features. This approach can enhance safety and efficiency in high-risk industries by guiding procedure design.

Keywords:
decision treemachine learningoperator performanceprocedure designrandom forest

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.6K
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Engineering
  • Human Factors
  • Computer Science

Background:

  • Procedures are critical for safety in high-risk industries.
  • Current guidelines lack quantitative analysis for diverse influencing factors.
  • Subjective assessments limit the integration of performance-influencing variables.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess machine learning models for predicting procedure performance.
  • To identify key operator and procedure characteristics influencing performance.
  • To develop data-driven approaches for procedure design.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a 25-participant, four-procedure oil extraction simulation.
  • Developed and compared logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and decision tree (DT) algorithms.
  • Employed Boruta feature selection and 10-fold cross-validation for model optimization.

Main Results:

  • RF, DT, and LR models achieved AUCs of 0.78, 0.77, and 0.75, respectively.
  • Models significantly outperformed LR with operator features only (AUC 0.61).
  • Key predictors included operator experience, familiarity, and text-based metrics (word/character counts).

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning offers a promising method for predicting step-level procedure performance.
  • Models can guide procedure design, but require further validation.
  • Text characteristics like brevity correlate with correct step execution.