Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025
Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Chronic Spinal Cord Compression
Published on: May 7, 2019
Diagnostic Role of Flexion-extension Central Motor Conduction Time in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Dougho Park1, Byung Hee Kim1, Jae Man Cho2
1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pohang Stroke and Spine Hospital, Pohang, Republic of Korea.
Study Design:
Retrospective study.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic usefulness of flexion-extension central motor conduction time(CMCT) for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
Summary Of Background Data:
Previous reports have suggested that cervical cord compression can be aggravated by neck motions. Thus, the importance of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been emphasized. However, authors of this study found no reports conducted at the time of this research on whether flexion-extension CMCT was useful for detecting myelopathy.
Methods:
We enrolled 227 patients with CSM for this study. We acquired CMCT recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis muscle. All patients underwent a dynamic CMCT study during neck flexion and extension as well as a static study during neutral neck. Static and dynamic MRIs were also scanned. We read all MR images using Muhle classification (MC).
Results:
CMCT was significantly delayed with flexion (P < 0.01) and extension (P < 0.01) compared to neutral neck position. Patients with MC grade 1 and 2 showed significant lag in CMCT during flexion and extension. No significant lag by neck motion was observed for those in the MC grade 3. We also evaluated the amount of CMCT variation according to MC grade change (G0, G1, G2) by neck motion. Delta-CMCT of both G1 and G2 were significantly larger than those of G0 in both flexion and extension. In neutral neck, the CMCT showed significant difference between MC grades 1 and 3. They also displayed significant delay with delay with high signal intensity on T2 MRI. More than one-third of the patients whose CMCT was within normal range in neutral neck presented abnormal CMCT in neck flexion (35.3%) and extension (37.8%).
Conclusion:
CMCT is significantly slower in both neck flexion and neck extension than in the neutral neck position. These findings reflect the dynamic cervical cord impingement.Level of Evidence: 4.
