Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Defining key questions for clinical practice guidelines: a novel approach for developing clinically relevant
Samantha Chakraborty1, Bianca Brijnath2,3, Jacinta Dermentzis2
1Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Building 1, 270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, Victoria, 3150, Australia. samantha.chakraborty@monash.edu.
This study aimed to create a standardised protocol for developing clinical questions used in medical guidelines. The team reviewed existing methods and added a step for qualitative research input. They tested the protocol by applying it to a general practice guideline, producing ten questions covering diagnosis, management, and follow-up. The goal was to make the process of forming guideline questions more consistent and clinically relevant. The authors suggest that other guideline developers can use this protocol to improve the quality of their questions.
Area of Science:
- Clinical guideline development
- Health services research
- Primary care medicine
Background:
Developing clinical questions for guidelines lacks a standardised protocol. Prior research has shown variability in how such questions are formed. No prior work had resolved how to integrate qualitative methods into this process. That uncertainty drove the need for a unified approach. This gap motivated a team to synthesise existing methods. They aimed to produce a reproducible protocol. Their focus was on general practitioners' needs. The goal was to improve consistency in guideline development.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aimed to create a standardised protocol for forming clinical guideline questions. It sought to combine existing methods with qualitative insights. The team reviewed international guideline manuals to find commonalities. They wanted to ensure the protocol was practical for guideline developers. The protocol needed to be adaptable across different clinical areas. The focus was on general practice guidelines. They tested the protocol by applying it to a real-world scenario. The goal was to show how the protocol could be used effectively.
Main Methods:
The team reviewed international guideline manuals to identify common steps. They synthesised these steps into a structured protocol. The protocol included space for qualitative research input. A consensus process was used to finalise the protocol. The protocol was tested by applying it to a new guideline. The team focused on general practitioners' needs. They developed clinical questions for diagnosis, management, and follow-up. The process was documented to show its reproducibility.
Main Results:
The team created a best-practice protocol for guideline question development. The protocol included steps for integrating qualitative research. They applied the protocol to a general practice guideline. Ten clinical questions were developed using the protocol. These questions covered diagnosis, management, and follow-up. The questions were structured to be clinically relevant. The protocol was shown to be practical and reproducible. The study demonstrated how qualitative insights could be incorporated.
Conclusions:
The study produced a standardised protocol for guideline question development. The protocol included qualitative research as a key component. It was successfully applied to a general practice guideline. The ten questions developed were clinically relevant. The protocol can be used by other guideline developers. It offers a structured way to form questions. The authors propose that this approach improves guideline quality. They suggest further testing in other clinical areas.
Frequently Asked Questions
The study introduces a standardised protocol for developing clinically relevant guideline questions, including a role for qualitative research.
The protocol was created through a review of international guideline manuals and a consensus process involving qualitative research integration.
The authors propose that qualitative insights help ensure clinical questions reflect real-world patient and practitioner needs.
The protocol was tested in general practice, producing ten questions covering diagnosis, management, and follow-up.
Ten clinically relevant questions were developed for a general practitioner-focused guideline.
The authors suggest that guideline developers can apply the protocol to improve consistency and relevance in question formulation.
Related Concept Videos
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Critical Thinking II
Patient-centered Care

