Accelerated and Standard Corneal Cross-Linking Protocols in Patients with Down Syndrome: A Non-inferiority...

To compare the results of an accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) protocol (9 mW/cm², 10 min) with the standard CXL protocol (3 mW/cm², 30 min) in patients with Down syndrome (DS) who have keratoconus (KC).

Twenty-seven 10- to 20-year-old patients with DS who had bilateral progressive KC were enrolled in a contralateral randomized trial and completed 2 years of follow-up examinations. Fellow eyes were randomly allocated to the accelerated CXL group or the standard CXL group. The main outcome measure was change in maximum keratometry (K_max) centered on the steepest point (zonal K_max - 3 mm) with a non-inferiority margin of 1.0 diopter (D). Vision and refraction tests, ophthalmic examinations, and corneal tomography were performed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months after CXL. Failure was defined as an increase of ≥ 1.0 D in zonal K_max - 3 mm within a 12-month period.

The mean age (± standard deviation) of the patients was 15.71 ± 2.40 years. The within-group change in zonal K_max - 3 mm was not significant after 2 years in either group, and within-group zonal K_max - 3 mm remained stable. At 2 years after CXL, the mean change in the zonal K_max - 3 mm was - 0.02 ± 0.81 D and - 0.31 ± 0.86 D in the accelerated CXL and standard CXL groups, respectively (P = 0.088). At 1 year of follow-up, three patients in the accelerated CXL group showed treatment failure (mean change in zonal K_max - 3 mm + 2.12 ± 0.11 D); no patients in the standard CXL group showed treatment failure. At 2 years of follow-up, these three patients showed a decrease of - 0.43 ± 0.18 D in zonal K_max - 3 mm from a baseline value of 55.11 ± 0.32 D. The 2-year trends of the inferior-superior asymmetry and vertical coma were statistically significantly different between the two groups, with the accelerated CXL protocol showing superiority in patients with higher baseline values.

In young patients with Down syndrome, the accelerated CXL protocol was able to halt disease progression and may be an alternative for the standard CXL protocol. In advanced KC, the efficacy of the accelerated approach was delayed and appeared later in the follow-up. In asymmetric cornea, the accelerated CXL resulted in centralization of the corneal cone.

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT20100706004333N3.