Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Delaying primary closure of classic bladder exstrophy: When is it too late?
Wayland J Wu1, Mahir Maruf1, Roni Manyevitch1
1Robert D. Jeffs Division of Pediatric Urology, Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Introduction:
With current trends towards delaying the closure of classic bladder exstrophy (CBE), bladder growth rate or ultimate capacity may be impacted.
Objective:
To examine consecutive bladder capacities in CBE patients who had primary closures at differing ages and determine whether there is an optimal age for closure, with reference to bladder capacity.
Study Design:
A retrospective review was performed using an institutional database.
Inclusion Criteria:
CBE, successful neonatal (i.e. ≤28 days old) or delayed (i.e. >28 days old) primary closure, at least three consecutive bladder capacities or two measures taken 18 months apart, and first bladder capacity measured ≥3 months after closure. Only capacities prior to continence surgery and before 14 years of age were considered. Two cohorts were created: neonatal and delayed closure. To account for repeated measurements per patient, a linear mixed model evaluated effects of age and length of delay on bladder capacity based on closure cohort. Individuals in the delayed closure group were further stratified into quartiles to assess for detriment to the bladder based on length of delay.
Results:
The cohort included 128 neonatal and 38 delayed patients. Median age at closure for the delayed group was 193 days (IQR 128-299). Based on univariate analysis, for the first three capacity measurements, the delayed group had significantly lower capacities despite having a similar median age when the measurements were taken. Linear mixed effects model showed significantly decreased total bladder capacity in delayed closure compared to neonates. The 2nd and 4th quartile groups had the most significant decreases in capacity.
Discussion:
Time points for the most significant decline appear after the 2nd and 4th quartiles, representing 4-6 months and beyond 9 months, respectively. From this, the authors theorize that the appropriate time to close an exstrophy patient is as early as possible (1st quartile), or, if a delay is needed for growth of a bladder template, then between 6 and 9 months (3rd quartile). There may be a detriment to growth rate, however, statistical power may be lacking to discern this. Study limitations include the single-centered, retrospective design. However, results described here fill an important deficit in the knowledge of managing CBE.
Conclusions:
All patients in the delayed bladder closure group demonstrated a decline in bladder capacity compared to the control neonatal closure group, with significant differences in the 2nd and 4th quartiles. Thus, closing the bladder prior to nine months of age is recommended.
More Related Videos
20:33A Case Series of Successful Abdominal Closure Utilizing a Novel Technique Combining a Mechanical Closure System with a Biologic Xenograft that Accelerates Wound Healing
Published on: July 4, 2019
10:19Evaluation of Biomaterials for Bladder Augmentation using Cystometric Analyses in Various Rodent Models
Published on: August 9, 2012