Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Anatomy of the Eyeball01:20

Anatomy of the Eyeball

9.1K
The eye is a spherical, hollow structure composed of three tissue layers. The outer layer — the fibrous tunic, comprises the sclera — a white structure — and the cornea, which is transparent. The sclera encompasses some of the ocular surface, most of which is not visible. However, the 'white of the eye' is distinctively visible in humans compared to other species. The cornea, a clear covering at the front of the eye, enables light penetration. The eye's middle...
9.1K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.5K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.5K
Color Vision01:24

Color Vision

1.1K
Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.
1.1K
Vision01:24

Vision

58.9K
Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.
58.9K
Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways01:22

Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways

8.2K
At the molecular level, visual signals trigger transformations in photopigment molecules, resulting in changes in the photoreceptor cell's membrane potential. The photon's energy level is denoted by its wavelength, with each specific wavelength of visible light associated with a distinct color. The spectral range of visible light, classified as electromagnetic radiation, spans from 380 to 720 nm. Electromagnetic radiation wavelengths exceeding 720 nm fall under the infrared category,...
8.2K
Focusing of Light in the Eye01:16

Focusing of Light in the Eye

4.6K
Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...
4.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same author

Steerable autoencoders underlying remapping, spatiotopy, and visual stability.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same author

Frame effects across space and time.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

The bookend effect.

i-Perception·2026
Same author

Different effects of flash-grab and frame stimuli on position shift and shape distortion.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Protocol for investigating the warping of spatial experience across the blind spot to contrast predictions of the Integrated Information Theory and Predictive Processing accounts of consciousness.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Pseudo-slimy: A novel phenomenon to evoke stickiness perception.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Predictive visual uncertainty around moving trajectories influences causality judgments in launching displays.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Light and shape in the work of Robert Fones.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Sensorimotor numerosity uniquely supports arithmetic development in children.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

In praise of anaglyphs.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Is number a primary perceptual attribute?

i-Perception·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.8K

Jumpy and Jerky: When Peripheral Vision Faces Reverse-Phi.

Jean Lorenceau1, Patrick Cavanagh2

  • 1Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, CNRS UMR 8022, Université de Paris.

I-Perception
|October 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Fast-moving visual stimuli with changing contrast create different perceptions in central versus peripheral vision. This illusion highlights how the brain processes motion differently based on location and attention.

Keywords:
motionperipheral visionreverse-phi

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

938
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

762

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.8K
Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

938
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

762

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Computational vision

Background:

  • Apparent motion perception is complex, especially with dynamic stimuli.
  • Contrast reversal in moving objects can lead to distinct visual experiences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differing visual percepts of an annulus undergoing contrast reversal in central versus peripheral vision.
  • To explore the influence of motion speed and reversal rate on this illusion.

Main Methods:

  • Presented a flickering annulus with rapid apparent motion and contrast reversal.
  • Compared subjective visual experiences in foveal and peripheral visual fields.
  • Analyzed the relationship between stimulus parameters (speed, reversal rate) and illusion strength.

Main Results:

  • Central vision perceived continuous motion, similar to non-flickering stimuli.
  • Peripheral vision experienced apparent random jumps of the annulus.
  • Illusion strength was modulated by motion speed and contrast reversal rate.

Conclusions:

  • The contrast reversal illusion reveals significant differences in central and peripheral motion processing.
  • Motion perception integrates discrete positional sampling and motion energy, with attention-dependent weighting.
  • This study underscores the role of attention in modulating visual processing at different retinal eccentricities.