Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Differences in author ranking: Development of SIGAPS scoring system for Japanese version
Yuji Nishizaki1, Yasuhiro Homma2, Rieko Ueda3
1Medical Technology Innovation Center Juntendo University Tokyo Japan.
The SIGAPS scoring system aids academic paper evaluation, but author ranking metrics may differ internationally. Reconsider author ranking weights when applying SIGAPS outside France for accurate research achievement assessment.
Area of Science:
- Bibliometrics
- Scientific evaluation
Background:
- The SIGAPS scoring system is valuable for assessing academic paper quality and research achievement.
- Existing metrics may not be universally applicable across different countries.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the international applicability of the SIGAPS scoring system.
- To determine if author ranking weights require adjustment for use outside France.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of SIGAPS scoring.
- Review of international research evaluation practices.
Main Results:
- SIGAPS scoring system values for author ranking can vary significantly by country.
- Current weighting may not accurately reflect research achievement globally.
Conclusions:
- The SIGAPS scoring system is a useful tool but requires adaptation for international contexts.
- Author ranking weighting in SIGAPS needs reconsideration for non-French applications to ensure fair research assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
Ranks

