Related Experiment Videos
Current Landscape of Generative AI Use as a Search Engine Among Resident Physicians: Cross-Sectional Study
Toshiki Miwa1, Koh Okamoto1,2, Yuji Nishizaki3
1Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
JMIR AI
|July 17, 2026
Summary
Generative AI (GenAI) use among resident physicians shows higher AI literacy and better infectious disease management behaviors compared to nonusers. However, GenAI literacy remains limited, necessitating education for all physicians.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Clinical Practice
Background:
- Generative AI (GenAI) literacy is crucial for resident physicians to prevent knowledge collapse and skill deficits in the evolving healthcare landscape.
- Resident physicians are highly susceptible to GenAI's influence, including those who are not yet users.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the extent of GenAI use as a clinical search engine among resident physicians.
- To compare GenAI literacy and bedside behaviors in infectious disease management between GenAI users and nonusers.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional survey was administered to resident physicians participating in Japan's General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE).
- The survey assessed GenAI usage, GenAI literacy, and perceived bedside behaviors, alongside demographic data and GM-ITE scores.
- Statistical analyses compared attitudes and behaviors between GenAI users and nonusers, adjusting for relevant covariates.
Main Results:
- Of 2850 respondents, 39.4% used GenAI as a clinical search engine; only 13% used it for primary differential diagnoses.
- GenAI users demonstrated higher understanding of GenAI limitations (e.g., confabulation) and essential competencies (e.g., history taking, physical examination) than nonusers.
- GenAI use was associated with improved perceived behaviors, including thorough examination and appropriate antimicrobial use, and greater awareness of ethical considerations like fairness and transparency.
Conclusions:
- GenAI use did not correlate with self-reported knowledge collapse indicators at this stage.
- GenAI literacy is limited among resident physicians, especially nonusers, highlighting a need for targeted education.
- Education on GenAI in clinical practice, focusing on critical thinking and ethics, is recommended for both users and nonusers.