Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of Motor Proficiency in People With Bleeding Disorders Using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2â„¢).

Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association·2026
Same author

Perceptions of and coping with racial and disability discrimination.

Rehabilitation psychology·2026
Same author

Fidelity of power mobility interventions for young children with disabilities: a systematic review.

Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology·2026
Same author

Four Years Into the Next Chapter at PSPR.

Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc·2026
Same author

Learning powered mobility: caregiver perceptions of young children's capabilities and device impact.

Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology·2026
Same author

Methodological considerations when assessing disability status in survey research: advantages and disadvantages of common approaches.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
09:24

Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable

Published on: May 17, 2024

1.9K

Real World Tracking of Modified Ride-On Car Usage in Young Children With Disabilities.

Samuel W Logan1, Christina M Hospodar1, Kathleen R Bogart1

  • 1Oregon State University.

Journal of Motor Learning and Development
|October 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study analyzed modified ride-on car usage in young children with disabilities, finding parent reports closely matched objective tracking data. Usage was higher in the first three months of the Go Baby Go program.

Keywords:
disabilityinterventionmobilitypower mobility

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism
09:03

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism

Published on: March 27, 2012

46.2K
Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
07:24

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis

Published on: August 8, 2019

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
09:24

Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable

Published on: May 17, 2024

1.9K
Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism
09:03

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism

Published on: March 27, 2012

46.2K
Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
07:24

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis

Published on: August 8, 2019

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric rehabilitation
  • Assistive technology
  • Child development

Background:

  • The Go Baby Go program provides modified ride-on cars to enhance mobility for young children with disabilities.
  • Understanding real-world usage is crucial for program effectiveness and future research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To document the actual use of modified ride-on cars by young children with disabilities.
  • To compare parent-reported usage data with objective electronic tracking data.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 14 children aged 1-3 years with disabilities participated over three months.
  • Utilized parent activity logs and electronic tracking devices to record car usage.

Main Results:

  • Parent-reported usage averaged 17.8 minutes/session and 195.1 total minutes.
  • Objective tracking showed 16.5 minutes/session and 171.4 total minutes.
  • No significant difference between reporting methods, but a notable mean absolute difference of 96 minutes suggests potential reporting discrepancies. Usage declined in the latter half of the study period.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support the reliability of parent-reported data when compared to objective measures for modified ride-on car usage.
  • Results can guide future research and inform local Go Baby Go chapters on program implementation and data collection.