Related Experiment Videos
Gun-Related and Other Violent Crime After Involuntary Commitment and Short-Term Emergency Holds
Jeffrey W Swanson1, Guangyu Tong2, Allison G Robertson2
1Dr. Swanson is Professor, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. Dr. Tong is Associate Research Scientist, Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT. Dr. Robertson is Associate Professor, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, and Associate Professor, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC. Dr. Swartz is Professor, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. jeffrey.swanson@duke.edu.
Abstract:
This article presents a survival analysis of long-term risk of firearm-related and other violent crime in a large sample of adults with serious mental illness in Florida, comparing those who received a gun-disqualifying civil commitment after a short-term hold, those who were evaluated for commitment but were released or hospitalized voluntarily, and a third group with no holds or commitments. Among 77,048 adults with a diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, or major depression, 42.7 percent were detained for psychiatric examination under Florida's Baker Act; of that detained group, 8.4 percent were involuntarily committed while the remainder were released within 72 hours or agreed to voluntary admission. Over a follow-up period averaging six to seven years, 7.5 percent of the sample were arrested for a violent offense not involving a gun, and 0.9 percent were arrested for a violent crime involving a gun. A short-term hold with or without commitment was associated with a significantly higher risk of future arrest for violent crime, although the study population had other violence risk factors unrelated to mental illness. Risk of gun-involved crime, specifically, was significantly higher in individuals following a short-term hold only, but not in those who were involuntarily committed and became ineligible to purchase or possess guns. Policy implications are discussed.