Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

7.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
7.4K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

12.9K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
12.9K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

296
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
296
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

98.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
98.7K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

450
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
450
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

253
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
253

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ultrasound-Informed State Estimation of Wrist Tremor Dynamics via Koopman Operator for Personalized Sensory Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

Metabolomic signatures of dietary carbohydrates and differential association with type 2 diabetes.

Nature health·2026
Same author

Low-fat dietary pattern and dementia mortality: a secondary analysis of the Women's Health Initiative dietary modification randomized clinical trial with long-term follow-up.

Menopause (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

The semi-competing risk problem revisited.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same author

Higher educational attainment in Huntington disease families: evidence from the Enroll-HD study.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2026
Same author

Estimating attributable risk functions for censored time-to-event in disease prevention research.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.6K

Robust methods to correct for measurement error when evaluating a surrogate marker.

Layla Parast1, Tanya P Garcia2, Ross L Prentice3

  • 1RAND Corporation, Statistics Group, Santa Monica, California.

Biometrics
|October 6, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces robust methods to correct for measurement error when evaluating surrogate markers, improving study efficiency. These techniques accurately assess surrogate marker utility, crucial for reliable clinical trial design.

Keywords:
kernel estimationmeasurement errornonparametricrobustsurrogate markertreatment effect

More Related Videos

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.6K
Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

17.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.6K
Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.6K
Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

17.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Valid surrogate markers accelerate clinical studies by reducing duration and cost.
  • Current methods for surrogate marker evaluation often neglect measurement error.
  • Ignoring measurement error can lead to incorrect conclusions about a surrogate marker's utility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and investigate robust statistical methods for evaluating surrogate markers in the presence of measurement error.
  • To quantify the bias introduced by measurement error in surrogate marker assessment.
  • To develop reliable inference procedures for variance and confidence intervals.

Main Methods:

  • Development of parametric and nonparametric estimators for the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker.
  • Correction for measurement error in surrogate marker evaluation.
  • Quantification of attenuation bias due to measurement error.
  • Simulation studies to assess performance of proposed methods.

Main Results:

  • Proposed estimators effectively correct for measurement error in surrogate markers.
  • Inference procedures demonstrate good performance in finite samples.
  • The methods were illustrated using hemoglobin A1c as a surrogate marker in the Diabetes Prevention Program trial.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate evaluation of surrogate markers requires adjustment for measurement error.
  • The proposed methods provide a robust framework for surrogate marker validation.
  • These techniques can enhance the reliability and efficiency of clinical research.