Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

6.7K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.7K
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

14.8K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
14.8K
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

18.4K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
18.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

QutRNA2: robust tRNA modification discovery from Nanopore direct tRNA sequencing.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Accelign: a GPU-based library for accelerating pairwise sequence alignment.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same author

gpuPairHMM: High-Speed Pair-HMM Forward Algorithm for DNA Variant Calling on GPUs.

IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics·2026
Same author

RMapAlign3N: fast mapping of 3N-Reads.

Bioinformatics advances·2025
Same author

GPU-accelerated homology search with MMseqs2.

Nature methods·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to Studying Privacy Aspects of Learned Knowledge Bases in the Context of Synthetic and Medical Data.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.6K

Big Data in metagenomics: Apache Spark vs MPI.

José M Abuín1,2, Nuno Lopes1, Luís Ferreira1

  • 12Ai-School of Technology, IPCA, Barcelos, Portugal.

Plos One
|October 6, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

MetaCache-MPI, a new Message Passing Interface (MPI) tool, offers faster and more memory-efficient analysis of metagenomic DNA sequencing data compared to Apache Spark solutions.

More Related Videos

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

30.8K
Metagenomic Analysis of Silage
08:43

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage

Published on: January 13, 2017

18.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.6K
Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

30.8K
Metagenomic Analysis of Silage
08:43

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage

Published on: January 13, 2017

18.8K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Next-generation sequencing generates massive datasets for biology and medicine.
  • Big Data technologies like Apache Spark are used for processing large-scale biological data.
  • High Performance Computing (HPC) with Message Passing Interface (MPI) offers potential performance gains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce MetaCache-MPI, an MPI-based software for metagenomic data analysis.
  • To evaluate the performance and memory efficiency of MetaCache-MPI against existing solutions.
  • To provide a faster and more memory-efficient alternative for building and querying metagenomic databases.

Main Methods:

  • Developed MetaCache-MPI using Message Passing Interface (MPI).
  • Compared MetaCache-MPI with the single CPU MetaCache and Apache Spark-based MetaCacheSpark.
  • Evaluated performance and RAM consumption for database building and querying using 32 processes.

Main Results:

  • MetaCache-MPI is 1.65x faster than MetaCacheSpark for database building (32 processes).
  • MetaCache-MPI uses 48.12% less RAM than MetaCacheSpark for database building.
  • MetaCache-MPI is 3.11x faster and uses 55.56% less RAM for database querying compared to MetaCacheSpark.

Conclusions:

  • MetaCache-MPI demonstrates superior speed and memory efficiency for metagenomic database construction and querying.
  • The MPI-based approach offers significant advantages over Spark for large-scale metagenomic data analysis.
  • MetaCache-MPI maintains the accuracy of the original MetaCache implementation while enhancing performance.