Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

05:49
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
1.2K
Benchmarking Orthogroup Inference Accuracy: Revisiting Orthobench
1Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Genome Biology and Evolution
|October 6, 2020
Summary
This study revises the Orthobench benchmark using advanced phylogenetic methods, updating 31 reference orthogroups (RefOGs) and improving orthogroup inference accuracy assessments.
Area of Science:
- Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
- Phylogenetics
Background:
- Orthobench is the standard benchmark for evaluating orthogroup inference methods.
- It comprises 70 expert-curated reference orthogroups (RefOGs) across Bilateria.
- Existing RefOGs present challenges for current orthogroup inference tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-evaluate and update the Orthobench benchmark using improved phylogenetic delineation.
- To assess the accuracy of widely used orthogroup inference methods with revised RefOGs.
- To provide an open-source suite for future Orthobench development and application.
Main Methods:
- Leveraged advanced tree inference algorithms and computational resources.
- Conducted extensive phylogenetic delineation of 70 expert-curated RefOGs.
- Utilized revised RefOGs to benchmark orthogroup inference method accuracy.
Main Results:
- Phylogenetic revision altered the membership of 31 out of 70 RefOGs.
- 24 RefOGs underwent extensive membership changes, while 7 had minor modifications.
- The study provides an updated assessment of orthogroup inference method performance.
Conclusions:
- The revised Orthobench benchmark offers a more accurate resource for evaluating orthogroup inference.
- Updated RefOGs facilitate a more reliable assessment of computational methods.
- An open-source suite is provided to support ongoing development and use of Orthobench.
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Bones
9.1K
The bones of the human skeletal system are of varied shapes, sizes, and functions. They can be classified based on their shape and function into four major classes: long bones, short bones, flat bones, and irregular bones. Some classifications include a fifth type, the sesamoid bones, as a separate class, whereas others categorize them under short bones.
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
9.1K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
479
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
479
Improving Translational Accuracy
3.4K
3.4K
Improving Translational Accuracy
13.2K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
13.2K

