Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Determining the Reference Values of the Measurements of Cervical Sagittal Alignment Using the Extrapolated Norms Method.

World neurosurgery·2025
Same author

Establishing Reference Values in the Neuromuscular Ultrasound Laboratory Using the e-Norms Method: A Feasibility Study.

Muscle & nerve·2025
Same author

Visual and Refractive Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a New Toric Intraocular Lens.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2025
Same author

E-norms and AI in clinical neurophysiology.

Clinical neurophysiology practice·2025
Same author

Determining the normative reference values for acute-phase inflammatory markers 3 days after lumbar fusion surgery by using the e-norms method.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2024
Same author

Updating the no-history method in intraocular lens power calculation after myopic laser vision correction.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2024
Same journal

Visual disability accommodations and ophthalmology.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Safety and efficacy of biosimilar aflibercept MYL-1701P in diabetic macular oedema: 20-week extension results following the INSIGHT pivotal trial.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Clinical efficacy of portable, cost-effective manual thermal pulsation for obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction and factors associated with therapeutic efficacy.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Long-term axial elongation in myopic children wearing DIMS spectacle lenses: an 8-to-10-year observational study.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

A systematic review of neuroprotective therapies for visual acuity preservation in retinitis pigmentosa.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Alternative posology for brolucizumab: a 6-week loading regimen is as effective as a 4-week regimen for the treatment of nAMD.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

441

Validating e-norms methodology in ophthalmic biometry.

H John Shammas1, Joe F Jabre2

  • 1Ophthalmology, USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.

BMJ Open Ophthalmology
|October 7, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The e-norms methodology successfully established a biometric reference range for intraocular lens calculations. This approach aids in grouping patients by axial length, improving refractive outcomes.

Keywords:
anterior chamberaqueous humoureye (globe)imaginglens and zonules

More Related Videos

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.7K
Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 6, 2025

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

441
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.7K
Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Optometry

Background:

  • Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is crucial for achieving desired refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.
  • Establishing reliable reference ranges for ocular biometric parameters is essential for IOL power calculation formulas.
  • Traditional methods for establishing normative data may not fully capture population variability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the extrapolated norms (e-norms) methodology for creating a reference range of biometric data.
  • To assess the utility of the e-norms methodology in the context of IOL power calculation.
  • To determine if the e-norms methodology can effectively cluster patients based on biometric differences.

Main Methods:

  • Measurements of axial length (AL), K readings (Ks), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and lens thickness (LT) were performed using an optical low-coherence reflectometer.
  • A novel e-norms methodology was employed to derive normative values for these biometric parameters.
  • Data from 500 eyes were analyzed to establish the reference ranges.

Main Results:

  • The e-norms methodology generated specific reference ranges: AL (22.50–24.50 mm), ACD (2.50–3.50 mm), LT (4.40–5.44 mm), and Ks (42.50–44.82 dioptres).
  • These established ranges allowed for the classification of eyes into categories such as short, medium-short, normal, medium-long, and long based on AL.
  • The mean values obtained using e-norms favorably compared with previously published data.

Conclusions:

  • The e-norms methodology effectively established a biometric reference range for ocular parameters.
  • This methodology provides a valuable tool for IOL power calculation by offering normative data and patient stratification.
  • The ability to cluster patients based on AL differences using e-norms can potentially refine refractive predictions.