Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vasovasostomy.

E S Yarbro, S S Howards

    The Urologic Clinics of North America
    |August 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    SpermCheck Fertility, an immunodiagnostic home test that detects normozoospermia and severe oligozoospermia.

    Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2010
    Same author

    Gamete retrieval in terminal conditions.

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2001
    Same author

    A novel technique for ventriculovesical shunting of congenital hydrocephalus.

    The Journal of urology·2001
    Same author

    Antisperm autoantibody response is reduced by early repair of a severed vas deferens in the juvenile rat.

    Fertility and sterility·2000
    Same author

    Chronic treatment with finasteride daily does not affect spermatogenesis or semen production in young men.

    The Journal of urology·1999
    Same author

    Sperm mitochondria-associated cysteine-rich protein (SMCP) is an autoantigen in Lewis rats.

    Biology of reproduction·1999
    Same journal

    An Unprecedented Era of Innovation in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Hubert Humphrey's Bladder Cancer: If He Could Have Time Traveled, Would that Have Changed the Outcome?

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Key Clinical Trials Shaping the Future of Superficial High-Risk Bladder Cancer Management.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Future Directions: Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools in Bladder Cancer Care.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Economic Considerations in the Management of Superficial Bladder Cancer.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Patient-Centered Approaches to Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Care.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    See all related articles

    Vasovasostomy, a surgical reversal of vasectomy, is increasingly popular due to improved techniques and outcomes. This review covers its evolution, training, equipment, and surgical methods, comparing results.

    Area of Science:

    • Urology
    • Surgical Techniques

    Background:

    • Vasovasostomy, the surgical reversal of vasectomy, has seen a resurgence in popularity.
    • Advances in surgical methods, instrumentation, and optics have significantly improved procedure outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the historical evolution of vasovasostomy.
    • To outline essential training and equipment for performing vasovasostomy.
    • To compare different surgical techniques and their postoperative results.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of historical and current vasovasostomy literature.
    • Description of macroscopic and microscopic surgical approaches.
    • Analysis of training methodologies and necessary equipment.
    • Comparison of postoperative success rates.
    Keywords:
    Family PlanningMicrosurgeryReversibilityReversible SterilizationSterilization ReversalSterilization, SexualSurgeryTreatmentUrogenital SurgeryVas Reanastomosis

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Vasovasostomy techniques have evolved significantly, leading to better patient outcomes.
    • Both macroscopic and microscopic approaches are detailed, with varying success rates.
    • Improvements in instruments and optics enhance surgical precision.

    Conclusions:

    • The increasing popularity of vasovasostomy is supported by advancements in surgical technology and techniques.
    • A comprehensive understanding of training, equipment, and operative methods is crucial for successful vasovasostomy.
    • Postoperative results vary depending on the technique employed and surgeon expertise.