Impact of age on mid-term clinical outcomes and left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization
Hiroaki Yokoyama1, Koki Shishido1, Kazuki Tobita1
1Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan.
Introduction:
The number of heart failure (HF) patients has been rapidly increasing in Japan, and considering the most explosive aging occurring in Asia, the management of elderly HF patients and longer life expectancy are critical issues. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the mid-term prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation was influenced by age and to investigate, in detail, the difference in the change ratio of echocardiographic parameters according to the age group of interest.
Methods And Results:
This retrospective analysis included 173 patients who underwent CRT implantation in our hospital from February 2008 to March 2019. Eighty patients (46%) were classified into the elderly group (≥75 years) and the rest in the non-elderly group. The study population was also classified with propensity score matching. The mid-term prognosis including all-cause death and hospitalization for HF, and the ratio of CRT responders were compared between the 2 groups. CRT response was defined as left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume reduction ≥15% at follow-up echocardiography within a year. During a median follow-up of 1057 [interquartile range: 412, 2107] days, adverse events were not significantly different between the 2 groups before and after matching (before matching; all-cause death: log-rank p = 0.323, hospitalization for HF: log-rank p = 0.376, after matching; all-cause death: log-rank p = 0.325, hospitalization for HF: log-rank p = 0.516). Moreover, the rate of CRT responders was not significantly different between the 2 groups before and after matching (before matching, p = 0.718; after matching, p = 0.666).
Conclusions:
In elderly HF patients, CRT provided the same clinical benefits as in non-elderly HF patients, furthermore, there was a similar trend in LV reverse remodeling between the 2 groups. The present study demonstrated that the indication of CRT implantation should not be determined by age.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age


