Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Comparative study of paper-and-pencil and electronic formats of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Maria Montoro1, Elsa Arrua-Duarte1,2, Belén Peñalver-Argüeso3
1Autónoma University, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract:
The gold standard for measuring anhedonia is the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). To date, there are no validated electronic versions of this questionnaire. We aim to study the equivalence between the traditional paper-and-pencil format and a digital version of the SHAPS. A group of 67 patients completed both SHAPS formats, and differences between formats were assessed. McNemar's test showed no significant differences between the two systems. The Kappa coefficient was over 40% for most items, and reliability was above 0.8, showing good to excellent levels of internal consistency. Thus, we have demonstrated a close equivalence between paper-and-pencil and electronic SHAPS.

