Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

07:56
Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
18.0K
DXA body composition corrective factors between Hologic Discovery models to conduct multicenter studies.
Thibault Sutter1, François Duboeuf2, Roland Chapurlat2
1EA 4708 I3MTO Laboratory, University of Orleans, Orleans, France.
Bone
|October 12, 2020
Summary
Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) body composition measurements show significant inter-center variability. This study quantifies these differences, proposing corrective factors essential for accurate multicenter research using Hologic Discovery DXA scanners.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Clinical Densitometry
- Body Composition Analysis
Background:
- Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a standard for body composition assessment in clinical and research settings.
- Variability in DXA measurements across different instruments necessitates caution in longitudinal studies and multicenter research.
- Standardization is crucial for reliable interpretation of body composition data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify intra- and inter-center variability of bone mineral content, bone mineral density, fat, and lean body composition measurements.
- To compare Hologic Discovery DXA models for consistency in body composition assessment.
- To calculate corrective factors for multicenter research projects using DXA.
Main Methods:
- A whole-body phantom was analyzed ten times across three centers using Hologic Discovery DXA scanners (QDR A and QDR W).
- Phantom analysis included bone, lean, and fat mass measurements.
- Stability and accuracy were monitored using vertebral and block phantoms.
Main Results:
- All devices demonstrated good long-term stability and accuracy.
- Intra-center coefficients of variation were within manufacturer-acceptable ranges (e.g., bone mineral density: 1.40%).
- Inter-center coefficients of variation exceeded 8% for bone mineral density and lean mass, highlighting significant discrepancies.
Conclusions:
- Significant inter-center discrepancies in DXA body composition measurements remain a major concern.
- Cross-calibration of DXA scanners is necessary for multicenter studies.
- Corrective factors derived from phantom studies are proposed to adjust multicenter DXA data.

