Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

14:23
Imaging Intermediate Filaments and Microtubules with 2-dimensional Direct Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy
Published on: March 6, 2018
11.2K
Rough or Noisy? Metrics for Noise Estimation in SfM Reconstructions.
1Department of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University, Rendsburggade 14, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 14, 2020
Summary
This study introduces new metrics to differentiate surface roughness from noise in 3D reconstructions from Structure from Motion (SfM). Machine learning models using these metrics achieve over 85% accuracy, improving 3D surface inspection.
Area of Science:
- Computer Vision
- 3D Reconstruction
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Structure from Motion (SfM) generates detailed 3D models but struggles to distinguish surface roughness from noise.
- Current SfM noise reduction methods are suboptimal for precise surface inspection.
- Existing noise algorithms do not leverage SfM's inherent data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop novel geometrical and statistical metrics for assessing noise in SfM reconstructions.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of supervised learning models trained with these metrics for noise-roughness discrimination.
- To improve the accuracy of 3D surface inspection by separating true surface features from reconstruction artifacts.
Main Methods:
- Proposed geometrical and statistical metrics for noise assessment.
- Utilized supervised learning models trained on these metrics.
- Incorporated data from both the reconstructed object and the camera setup.
- Created and released a new image dataset for SfM with ground truth annotations.
Main Results:
- Developed metrics that correlate with noise presence on reconstructed surfaces.
- Achieved over 85% accuracy in distinguishing noise from roughness using supervised learning.
- Demonstrated an additional 5-6% performance improvement by including camera setup metrics.
- The proposed solution integrates seamlessly into existing SfM workflows.
Conclusions:
- Novel metrics and supervised learning effectively separate noise from surface roughness in SfM.
- The method enhances the reliability of 3D reconstructions for surface inspection.
- The approach is practical, requiring no additional data or sensors and is dataset-available.

