Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.9K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

542
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
542
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.6K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.2K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.2K
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness01:14

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness

2.3K
Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
2.3K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

896
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
896

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Environmental uncertainty shapes human effort learning.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

The social dimension of apathy: evidence for a distinct domain from 11,243 individuals across health and neurocognitive disorders.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

Central Questions for Social Neuroscience Research.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Humans are more prosocial in poor foraging environments.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Interaction and functional specialization across a distributed neural circuit for flexible task control in macaques.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Psychological interventions that decrease psychological distance or challenge system justification increase motivation to exert effort to mitigate climate change.

Communications psychology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.3K

Model-free decision making is prioritized when learning to avoid harming others.

Patricia L Lockwood1,2,3, Miriam C Klein-Flügge1,2, Ayat Abdurahman4,2

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PH, United Kingdom; p.l.lockwood@bham.ac.uk miriam.klein-flugge@psy.ox.ac.uk molly.crockett@yale.edu.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|October 15, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Moral learning prioritizes efficient model-free decision-making when avoiding harm to others. This process involves specific brain regions like the thalamus/caudate and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC).

Keywords:
learningmodel-freemoralneuroimagingprediction error

More Related Videos

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

14.2K
Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.3K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

14.2K
Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

4.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Moral Psychology

Background:

  • Moral behavior necessitates learning the consequences of actions on others.
  • Theoretical learning frameworks distinguish between model-free (action-value caching) and model-based (action-outcome mapping) algorithms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the engagement and neural underpinnings of model-free versus model-based learning mechanisms in moral decision-making.
  • To examine how learning to avoid personal harm differs from learning to avoid harming others.

Main Methods:

  • Participants learned to avoid painful electric shocks for themselves and a stranger.
  • Behavioral choices and neural activity (fMRI) were recorded during the learning and decision phases.
  • Individual differences in moral judgment were assessed.

Main Results:

  • Model-free decision-making was prioritized when learning to avoid harming others compared to oneself.
  • Neural correlates of model-free prediction errors for others relative to self were identified in the thalamus/caudate.
  • Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) showed activity related to model-free moral learning during choice, with enhanced sgACC-dlPFC connectivity after harming others.

Conclusions:

  • Moral learning appears to favor efficiency (model-free) over flexibility (model-based) when avoiding harm to others.
  • Specific neural circuits, including the thalamus/caudate and sgACC, support model-free moral learning.
  • Individual moral judgment styles influence the model-free moral learning process.