Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

A Real-World High-Intensity Interval Training Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Improvement
Published on: February 22, 2022
A Pilot Study on In-Task Affect Predicting Free-Living Adherence to HIIT and MICT
Elena Ivanova1, Gentiana Sadikaj2, Jessica E Bourne3
1University of British Columbia.
Affect during exercise may influence long-term physical activity. For moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), negative feelings predicted less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) over time, but this was not seen with high-intensity interval training (HIIT).
Area of Science:
- Exercise Science
- Behavioral Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Supervised exercise programs are crucial for improving physical activity levels, especially in populations like adults with prediabetes.
- Understanding the psychological factors influencing exercise adherence, such as in-task affect, is vital for designing effective interventions.
- Both moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) are established exercise modalities, but their impact on affect and subsequent physical activity may differ.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether in-task affect during supervised exercise predicts changes in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at 1- and 6-month follow-ups.
- To compare the predictive utility of in-task affect on MVPA between MICT and HIIT interventions.
- To provide pilot data on the relationship between exercise-induced feelings and long-term physical activity maintenance.
Main Methods:
- A pilot experimental study randomized 32 inactive adults with prediabetes to a 2-week supervised MICT or HIIT program with behavioral counseling.
- In-task affect was assessed using the Feeling Scale (FS) at specific time points during exercise sessions.
- Objective physical activity was measured using accelerometers at 1- and 6-month post-intervention to determine changes in MVPA (Total and bouts ≥ 10 minutes).
Main Results:
- In-task affect did not predict changes in total MVPA from baseline to 1 and 6 months across both conditions.
- However, negative in-task affect was found to predict a decrease in MVPA in bouts of ≥ 10 minutes (MVPA10+) over time, specifically within the MICT group.
- No significant difference was observed in the utility of in-task affect for predicting MVPA-Total between HIIT and MICT.
Conclusions:
- Preliminary evidence suggests that negative affect experienced during moderate-intensity continuous training may hinder the maintenance of longer bouts of physical activity.
- In-task affect's role in predicting overall physical activity levels (MVPA-Total) did not differ between HIIT and MICT in this pilot study.
- Larger-scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings and explore the nuanced relationship between exercise affect and physical activity adherence.
More Related Videos
09:42Using Continuous Data Tracking Technology to Study Exercise Adherence in Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Published on: November 8, 2013
06:28A Chronic High-Intensity Interval Training and Diet-Induced Obesity Model to Maximize Exercise Effort and Induce Physiologic Changes in Rats
Published on: April 28, 2023