Food insecurity: Comparing odds between working-age veterans and nonveterans with children
Nipa Kamdar1, Houston F Lester2, Sajeevika Saumali Daundasekara3
1VA Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center,Houston, TX; University of Houston, Department of Health and Human Performance, Houston, TX.
Background:
Low-income, working-age Veterans with children have risk for food insecurity. Less known is extent to which their risk compares to nonveterans.
Purpose:
To evaluate odds of food insecurity for working-age Veterans with children compared to socioeconomically-matched nonveterans with children.
Method:
We constructed a propensity score-matched cohort using 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Covariate-adjusted logistic regressions estimated Veterans' odds for overall food insecurity and for each level of severity compared to nonveterans.
Findings:
We matched 155 Veterans to 310 nonveterans on gender, race/ethnicity, education, income. Models were adjusted for age, marital-status, depression, and listed matched variables. Although Veteran-status had no effect on overall food insecurity (odds ratio = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [0.62,1.93]), Veteran-status increased odds for very low food security (odds ratio = 2.71, 95% confidence interval [1.21, 6.07]).
Discussion:
Veterans do not have higher odds of food insecurity than non-veterans, but they are more likely to have the more severe very low food security (often associated with hunger) than non-veterans. Investigation of food insecurity's impact on Veteran health/well-being is needed.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Odds Ratio
Relative Risk
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes


