Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Primary Results From the Understanding Outcomes With the S-ICD in Primary Prevention Patients With Low Ejection
Michael R Gold1, Pier D Lambiase2, Mikhael F El-Chami3
1Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (M.R.G.).
Insights
The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is safe and effective for preventing sudden cardiac death. Contemporary S-ICD use in high-risk patients shows a low inappropriate shock rate, demonstrating improved safety and efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) are used for sudden cardiac death prevention.
- Previous S-ICD studies included patients with fewer comorbidities and less left ventricular dysfunction.
- Higher inappropriate shock rates (IAS) were observed in earlier S-ICD trials compared to transvenous ICD trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the inappropriate shock rate (IAS) in a contemporary S-ICD patient population.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of S-ICD in primary prevention patients with low ejection fraction.
- To compare IAS rates with a performance goal derived from the MADIT-RIT study.
Main Methods:
- The UNTOUCHED trial enrolled primary prevention patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%.
- Generation 2 or 3 S-ICD devices were implanted and programmed with specific rate and morphology discrimination criteria.
- Patients were followed for 18 months to assess the primary endpoint of IAS-free rate.
Main Results:
- Eighteen-month freedom from IAS was 95.9%, exceeding the performance goal.
- The 18-month all-cause shock-free rate was 90.6%, meeting the prespecified goal.
- Complication-free rate at 18 months was 92.7%; conversion success rate for appropriate shocks was 98.4%.
Conclusions:
- Contemporary S-ICD devices and programming demonstrate high efficacy and safety in a high-comorbidity patient population.
- The observed inappropriate shock rate is the lowest reported for S-ICD and compares favorably to transvenous ICD studies.
- S-ICD is a safe and effective option for sudden cardiac death prevention in contemporary patients.
Background:
The subcutaneous (S) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is safe and effective for sudden cardiac death prevention. However, patients in previous S-ICD studies had fewer comorbidities, had less left ventricular dysfunction, and received more inappropriate shocks (IAS) than in typical transvenous ICD trials. The UNTOUCHED trial (Understanding Outcomes With the S-ICD in Primary Prevention Patients With Low Ejection Fraction) was designed to evaluate the IAS rate in a more typical, contemporary ICD patient population implanted with the S-ICD using standardized programming and enhanced discrimination algorithms.
Methods:
Primary prevention patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and no pacing indications were included. Generation 2 or 3 S-ICD devices were implanted and programmed with rate-based therapy delivery for rates ≥250 beats per minute and morphology discrimination for rates ≥200 and <250 beats per minute. Patients were followed for 18 months. The primary end point was the IAS-free rate compared with a 91.6% performance goal, derived from the results for the ICD-only patients in the MADIT-RIT study (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduce Inappropriate Therapy). Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to evaluate event-free rates for IAS, all-cause shock, and complications. Multivariable proportional hazard analysis was performed to determine predictors of end points.
Results:
S-ICD implant was attempted in 1116 patients, and 1111 patients were included in postimplant follow-up analysis. The cohort had a mean age of 55.8±12.4 years, 25.6% were women, 23.4% were Black, 53.5% had ischemic heart disease, 87.7% had symptomatic heart failure, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 26.4±5.8%. Eighteen-month freedom from IAS was 95.9% (lower confidence limit, 94.8%). Predictors of reduced incidence of IAS were implanting the most recent generation of device, using the 3-incision technique, no history of atrial fibrillation, and ischemic cause. The 18-month all-cause shock-free rate was 90.6% (lower confidence limit, 89.0%), meeting the prespecified performance goal of 85.8%. Conversion success rate for appropriate, discrete episodes was 98.4%. Complication-free rate at 18 months was 92.7%.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates high efficacy and safety with contemporary S-ICD devices and programming despite the relatively high incidence of comorbidities in comparison with earlier S-ICD trials. The inappropriate shock rate (3.1% at 1 year) is the lowest reported for the S-ICD and lower than many transvenous ICD studies using contemporary programming to reduce IAS. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02433379.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion,...
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...

