Regulatory review time and pharmaceutical research and development
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
Published on: March 17, 2023
Anna Chorniy1, James Bailey2, Abdulkadir Civan3
1Department of Medical Social Sciences, Buehler Center for Health Policy & Economics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract:
In the United States, all newly developed drugs undergo a lengthy review process conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These regulatory delays have direct immediate costs for drug manufacturers and patients waiting for treatment. Under certain market conditions, regulatory delays may also affect future research and development (R&D) strategies of pharmaceutical companies. To estimate the magnitude of this effect, we match data on drugs in the development pipeline in 2006 to data that we collect on FDA review times for all drugs approved between 1999 and 2005. Employing a rich and novel set of controls that affect drug R&D decisions and, potentially, regulatory review lags, we find that on average, three additional months of delay result in one fewer drug in development in that drug category. Our results suggest that the length of the regulatory delay matters for pharmaceutical firms' R&D decisions and that the firms are likely unable to pass on these costs onto consumers.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation

