Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 4, 2025

An Implantable System For Chronic In Vivo Electromyography
Published on: April 21, 2020
Electrical Stun Gun and Modern Implantable Cardiac Stimulators: Update for a New Stun Gun Model
Eugenio Mattei1, Federica Censi, Giovanni Calcagnini
1Italian National Institute of Health, Department of Cardiovascular, Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases and Aging, Rome, Italy.
Abstract:
In 2017, the Italian National Institute of Health conducted a study to evaluate the potential risks of Conducted Electrical Weapons (CEW, AKA "stun guns") for users bearing a pacemaker (PM) or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The study addressed two specific models of stun guns: the TASER model X2 and AXON model X26P. In 2019, the same experimental protocol and testing procedure was adopted to evaluate the risk for another model of stun gun, the MAGEN model 5 (MAGEN, Israel). The MAGEN 5 differs from the previous stun guns tested in terms of peak voltage generated, duration of the shock, and trigger modality for repeated shocks. This note is an update of the previous study results, including the measurements on the MAGEN 5 stun gun. Despite the differences between the stun gun models, the effects on the PM/ICD behavior were the same as previously observed for the TASER stun guns.
More Related Videos
10:50Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
Published on: June 6, 2012
10:41A Wireless, Bidirectional Interface for In Vivo Recording and Stimulation of Neural Activity in Freely Behaving Rats
Published on: November 7, 2017